Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted (edited)

per ESPN:

 

Mitre told ESPN.com that while he takes "full responsibility" for his actions, he failed a drug test because a trace amount of androstenedione appeared without his knowledge in a nutritional supplement that he bought at GNC.

 

"Although being suspended for 50 games is tough to accept, I think that it is important to understand that I am in full support of drug testing in baseball," Mitre said in a statement released through his agent, Paul Cobbe. "I did take the supplement in question and accept full responsibility for taking it. What has been difficult for me to understand is that I legally purchased this supplement at GNC and had no intention nor desire to cheat or to circumvent the system in any way.

 

"As confirmed through the drug testing and grievance processes, it contained a 'contaminant' amount of an illegal, performance-enhancing drug. This was not listed as an ingredient on the packaging, should not have been in the supplement and certainly should not have been available for legal purchase at a store."

Edited by kente777

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.
Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

 

Trainers should be supplying all the supplements directly to players and responsible for knowing what is legal and not.

Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

 

But if the supplement did not list an illegal substance and he did his due diligence prior to taking it, how is he supposed to know about it?

Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

While I agree with this in theory; it seems as though Mitre did try to make sure what he was taking was legit. If it's true that the andro was not listed on the packaging it would seem as though he did check to make sure there was not any andro in the supplement by reading the ingredients, and then taking the supplement.

 

That said, props to him for not whining and bitching and accepting responsibility - if everything he claimed is true.

Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

 

But if the supplement did not list an illegal substance and he did his due diligence prior to taking it, how is he supposed to know about it?

 

That's the bad part about GNC and stuff like that- it's stuff that's not FDA approved, and they don't have the same guidelines about listing contents and whatnot.

 

Most companies probably put stuff like that in there without listing it because it's probably the only thing in the product that actually gives any results.

Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

 

But if the supplement did not list an illegal substance and he did his due diligence prior to taking it, how is he supposed to know about it?

 

How do we know he did his due diligence? How do we know he didn't take a supplement with andro so he could use it as an excuse to actually take andro?

 

Players don't have to shop at GNC. It's an unregulated business and the labelling is completely unreliable. Every year we hear about guys being shocked about what was in there supplement. Jim Freaking Miller pulled that crap back in 1999.

 

The bottom line is the players are responsible for what they put in their body. It's not hard to avoid the junk.

Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

 

But if the supplement did not list an illegal substance and he did his due diligence prior to taking it, how is he supposed to know about it?

 

Which is why the manic state that surrounds "performance enhancing drugs" in sports is absolutely ridiculous and overblown. I think you are eventually going to see more lawsuits like the one recently involving the 5 NFL players over this issue and could evolve into suits against the manufacturers(I won't get into the proof problems that they would have to deal with). All of which is sad because if this issue was approached with a level-headedness across the board a resolution could be reached to avoid some of the nonsense.

 

50 games for Mitre and Romero just because they took something from GNC which the league knows should not have had the substance contained in it but in fact did. Really? 'Cause that makes sense.

Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

 

But if the supplement did not list an illegal substance and he did his due diligence prior to taking it, how is he supposed to know about it?

 

Which is why the manic state that surrounds "performance enhancing drugs" in sports is absolutely ridiculous and overblown. I think you are eventually going to see more lawsuits like the one recently involving the 5 NFL players over this issue and could evolve into suits against the manufacturers(I won't get into the proof problems that they would have to deal with). All of which is sad because if this issue was approached with a level-headedness across the board a resolution could be reached to avoid some of the nonsense.

 

50 games for Mitre and Romero just because they took something from GNC which the league knows should not have had the substance contained in it but in fact did. Really? 'Cause that makes sense.

 

Wow, I could not agree with you more. It does seem sometimes like we live in 1600s Salem when it comes to PEDs. Maybe soon athletes will bring their trainers to restaurants with them just to make sure the cook doesn't taint their food with drugs.

Posted
Wow. Before this thread I didn't even know GNC was not regulated. Of course, I'm not a pro athlete or anything, but I had no idea that the stuff I take could have PED's in them. Sweet.
Posted
I never really understand why/how this can ever happen. If a player truly is taking something that he doesn't know contains an illegal/banned substance, why wouldn't that player take it to a trainer/doctor/MLBPA and ask them if it was ok to take, before even starting to take it? These suspensions are worth millions to players over misunderstandings so why not take the extra time to make sure what you are taking isn't something illegal? Also why doesn't the MLBPA/MLB figure out a way to put some sort of logo/symbol on supplements/pills/drinks that are legal to use for players? That would seem like the easiest thing to do and then you don't have a language barrier or misunderstanding if MLBPA/MLB has stamped its approval of the supplement. Or tell players if they want to go take some sort supplement/pill or whatever they have to order through the team and then the team checks it out through MLB/MLBPA to make sure it's not banned and then they can proceed to give it to the player.
Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

 

But if the supplement did not list an illegal substance and he did his due diligence prior to taking it, how is he supposed to know about it?

 

How do we know he did his due diligence? How do we know he didn't take a supplement with andro so he could use it as an excuse to actually take andro?

 

Players don't have to shop at GNC. It's an unregulated business and the labelling is completely unreliable. Every year we hear about guys being shocked about what was in there supplement. Jim Freaking Miller pulled that crap back in 1999.

 

The bottom line is the players are responsible for what they put in their body. It's not hard to avoid the junk.

 

Your first paragraph is a completely valid issue to raise and is the crux of the problem. But one that could be resolved if it was just talked out.

 

The next two, however, are problematic. At some level none of us know exactly what we put in our body. Popcorn is allowed to have so much rodent hair in it... do you know you're ingesting rodent fibers when you eat popcorn?

 

It is nearly impossible to put your body through a professional season and not take some sort of supplement. And supplements do include Protein and vitamins. Where should they get those at then? The internet... hmmm... that's pretty well regulated and you didn't like retail stores like GNC for that. I suppose an option would be for the MLB to license supplements and someone at each team test a sample from each package before they give them out to the players.

Posted
if what he's saying is true, i don't see how it would be fair to follow through with the suspension....if a professional ballplayer takes a supplement from GNC and the illegal substance is not listed as an ingredient, i don't think you can hold the player responsible imo.

 

Disagree. It's the players responsibility to make sure what he's taking is legit.

 

But if the supplement did not list an illegal substance and he did his due diligence prior to taking it, how is he supposed to know about it?

 

How do we know he did his due diligence? How do we know he didn't take a supplement with andro so he could use it as an excuse to actually take andro?

 

Players don't have to shop at GNC. It's an unregulated business and the labelling is completely unreliable. Every year we hear about guys being shocked about what was in there supplement. Jim Freaking Miller pulled that crap back in 1999.

 

The bottom line is the players are responsible for what they put in their body. It's not hard to avoid the junk.

 

Peter Gammons wrote an excellent article on the Romero situation (which for the most part applies to Mitre as well).

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3812334

 

I found this snippet particularly relevant:

 

Three months after Romero was tested before a Phillies-Mets game on Aug. 26, the players' association sent a Nov. 21 letter to players that stated, "We have previously told you there is no reason to believe a supplement bought at a U.S. based retail store could cause you to test positive under our Drug Program. That is no longer true. We have recently learned of three substances which can be bought over the counter at stores in the United States that will cause you to test positive. These three supplements were purchased at a GNC and Vitamin Shoppe in the U.S."

 

In Romero's arbitration hearing that was held in Tampa, Fla., during the first two days of the World Series, it was claimed that, in early July, the National Center for Drug Free Sport had notified MLB of questions about the supplement Romero had purchased. Somehow, MLB and the players' association never got that straight, according to Romero.

 

Also, Gammons wrote that the supplement bottle brought to the hearing by MLB contained a warning label about potentially containing illegal PEDs. Romero brought the bottle that he used, which did not contain that warning label.

Posted
Three months after Romero was tested before a Phillies-Mets game on Aug. 26, the players' association sent a Nov. 21 letter to players that stated, "We have previously told you there is no reason to believe a supplement bought at a U.S. based retail store could cause you to test positive under our Drug Program.

 

Idiots. Why would they say that? That's incompetence by the union.

Posted
The next two, however, are problematic. At some level none of us know exactly what we put in our body. Popcorn is allowed to have so much rodent hair in it... do you know you're ingesting rodent fibers when you eat popcorn?

 

If rodent hair could cause you to lose your job, you should eat something besides popcorn. It's widely known that the supplements industry is unregulated. It's happened repeatedly where players have tested positive for something they were sure was perfectly clean. Jim Miller was a highly publicized case of this in 1999. You don't just accidentally injest supplements. Either take stuff that is known to be clean, or don't take the stuff.

Posted
BTW, if Andro is a banned substance, then technically doesn't think prove that McGwire was using PEDs when he was playing?

 

It was added to the banned list after McGwire was found with it.

 

Yeah, it wasn't illegal PED use, but he was using PEDs that are no longer allowed which contributed to his 580+ HRs. He's not guilty of illegally using them from the info we know, but his numbers can be called into question based on what he's admitted to using.

Posted
BTW, if Andro is a banned substance, then technically doesn't think prove that McGwire was using PEDs when he was playing?

 

It was added to the banned list after McGwire was found with it.

 

Yeah, it wasn't illegal PED use, but he was using PEDs that are no longer allowed which contributed to his 580+ HRs. He's not guilty of illegally using them from the info we know, but his numbers can be called into question based on what he's admitted to using.

 

ex post facto?

Posted
BTW, if Andro is a banned substance, then technically doesn't think prove that McGwire was using PEDs when he was playing?

 

It was added to the banned list after McGwire was found with it.

 

Yeah, it wasn't illegal PED use, but he was using PEDs that are no longer allowed which contributed to his 580+ HRs. He's not guilty of illegally using them from the info we know, but his numbers can be called into question based on what he's admitted to using.

 

ex post facto?

 

I think what UMFan83 is saying that since McGwire admitted to using andro, it's not hard to assume he also used PEDs that were illegal at the time. That's a slippery slope argument, if you ask me, but it's the common belief.

Posted
BTW, if Andro is a banned substance, then technically doesn't think prove that McGwire was using PEDs when he was playing?

 

It was added to the banned list after McGwire was found with it.

 

Yeah, it wasn't illegal PED use, but he was using PEDs that are no longer allowed which contributed to his 580+ HRs. He's not guilty of illegally using them from the info we know, but his numbers can be called into question based on what he's admitted to using.

 

ex post facto?

 

Sorta, I'm not saying based on what we know is true we can admonish the guy, but in historical context we can lessen the significance of his numbers based on evidence that he used PED's that we know hold to be illegal. Sort of like how we give extra credit to those hitters that played in the 60's for lesser numbers in a pitchers era with a higher mound in use.

 

Of course there's also the dark cloud of steroids use that we can't prove yet if ever.

Posted
The next two, however, are problematic. At some level none of us know exactly what we put in our body. Popcorn is allowed to have so much rodent hair in it... do you know you're ingesting rodent fibers when you eat popcorn?

 

If rodent hair could cause you to lose your job, you should eat something besides popcorn. It's widely known that the supplements industry is unregulated. It's happened repeatedly where players have tested positive for something they were sure was perfectly clean. Jim Miller was a highly publicized case of this in 1999. You don't just accidentally injest supplements. Either take stuff that is known to be clean, or don't take the stuff.

 

How many times are you going to mention Jim Miller? Every time you post about this stuff? Way to cut to my obviously playful analogy and ignore the rest. And the point for that matter.

 

HOW DO YOU KNOW IT IS CLEAN????????????????????????????????????????????

 

Perhaps with the scenario I suggested and I'd welcome other scenarios I'm not thinking of at the moment.

Posted

CHOCOLATE AND CHOCOLATE LIQUOR

 

Insect filth

(AOAC 965.38) Average is 60 or more insect fragments per 100 grams when 6 100-gram subsamples are examined

OR

Any 1 subsample contains 90 or more insect fragments

 

Rodent filth

(AOAC 965.38) Average is 1 or more rodent hairs per 100 grams in 6 100-gram subsamples examined

OR

Any 1 subsample contains 3 or more rodent hairs

 

Shell

(AOAC 968.10-970.23) For chocolate liquor, if the shell is in excess of 2% calculated on the basis of alkali-free nibs

 

DEFECT SOURCE: Insect fragments - post harvest and/or processing insect infestation, Rodent hair - post harvest and/or processing contamination with animal hair or excreta, Shell - processing contamination

SIGNIFICANCE: Aesthetic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...