Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

It appears that the Rangers are interested in shopping Mench and the Cubs have been metioned as a destination.

 

Link

 

In the meantime, the Rangers will explore how they can improve their team by trade. That will likely mean listening to what teams are willing to offer for Mench. Mench, who is eligible for salary arbitration this winter, is expected to see his salary jump from $376,000 to approximately $2 million. He is also under the Rangers control (or the control of whoever acquires him) for three more seasons.

 

A number of teams, including Kansas City, the Chicago Cubs and Pittsburgh, have all inquired about Mench, who recently switched agents.

 

 

Mench is 27 years old, but is likely not the impact bat we crave for RF. In 2005, he hit 264/328/469 with 25 HR's. From 2002-2004, he hit 276/337/496.

 

Unlike most Rangers in 2005, his road splits aren't significantly different than his home splits. So, should we be interested in Mench and how much should we pay to get him?

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
It appears that the Rangers are interested in shopping Mench and the Cubs have been metioned as a destination.

 

Link

 

In the meantime, the Rangers will explore how they can improve their team by trade. That will likely mean listening to what teams are willing to offer for Mench. Mench, who is eligible for salary arbitration this winter, is expected to see his salary jump from $376,000 to approximately $2 million. He is also under the Rangers control (or the control of whoever acquires him) for three more seasons.

 

A number of teams, including Kansas City, the Chicago Cubs and Pittsburgh, have all inquired about Mench, who recently switched agents.

 

 

Mench is 27 years old, but is likely not the impact bat we crave for RF. In 2005, he hit 264/328/469 with 25 HR's. From 2002-2004, he hit 276/337/496.

 

Unlike most Rangers in 2005, his road splits aren't significantly different than his home splits. So, should we be interested in Mench and how much should we pay to get him?

 

Already being discussed in the Walker to the Indians thread...just an FYI..

 

I guess it could use its own thread, though.

Posted (edited)

he has solid plate discipline, but hasn't hit for average...yet. if that falls in line, we might be looking at a cheap .875-.900 OPS player. that's obviously not a sure thing though.

 

if we did get Mench, who makes the league minimum, we'd have a ton of money to spend elsewhere (SS, 2B, CF, rotation, pen). i don't endorse that, but hey, i guess it's nice to see hendry interested in a guy with plate discipline. :?

 

...or he could be a solid bench option.

Edited by Meat&PotatoesMan
Posted
It appears that the Rangers are interested in shopping Mench and the Cubs have been metioned as a destination.

 

Link

 

In the meantime, the Rangers will explore how they can improve their team by trade. That will likely mean listening to what teams are willing to offer for Mench. Mench, who is eligible for salary arbitration this winter, is expected to see his salary jump from $376,000 to approximately $2 million. He is also under the Rangers control (or the control of whoever acquires him) for three more seasons.

 

A number of teams, including Kansas City, the Chicago Cubs and Pittsburgh, have all inquired about Mench, who recently switched agents.

 

 

Mench is 27 years old, but is likely not the impact bat we crave for RF. In 2005, he hit 264/328/469 with 25 HR's. From 2002-2004, he hit 276/337/496.

 

Unlike most Rangers in 2005, his road splits aren't significantly different than his home splits. So, should we be interested in Mench and how much should we pay to get him?

 

Vance,

I would pass on Mench. I'd rather sign Reggie Sanders (for example), despite his age, than give up talent to get Mench.

 

Hoops

Hoops

Posted
I wouldn't mind this guy as a 4th OF but not as a starter and not for an even up trade for Walker.

 

Compare him to Austin Kearns. What would we have to pay to get Kearns? I'd say Walker + Mitre would be fair. Also, it cures JH the temptation of using Walker to get Soriano.

Posted
I wouldn't mind this guy as a 4th OF but not as a starter and not for an even up trade for Walker.

 

Compare him to Austin Kearns. What would we have to pay to get Kearns? I'd say Walker + Mitre would be fair. Also, it cures JH the temptation of using Walker to get Soriano.

 

How old is Kearns? I don't see Mench as a 30 HR guy and as I said if he can't play defense I have no interest in him with his marginal numbers in that small park that he plays in. If I have to think about possible bad decisions that Hendry and/or Baker are going to make I have to say the problem isn't the team but the people in charge of the team.

Posted

What if we could get Mench for Mitre and Leicester? Both pitchers are out of options and likely are no longer in the Cubs immediate plans. We could end up losing both pitchers to a waiver claim at the end of spring training.

 

While I doubt Mitre and Leicester are near enough to get the Rangers to bite, it surely isn't a bad offer if the Rangers can get Mitre to work consistently in the zone.

 

Mench isn't a horrible option, but I'll agree he isn't the best. I'd rather have Giles for rightfield, but trading for Mench would give us insurance in the case we can't sign or trade for a bigger name.

Posted

It's not a dealbreaker, but he is yet another right handed bat. Trading Todd Walker for him would give up the one current player the Cubs have signed that's a decent hitter from the left side.

 

Also, it looks like Mench can play right, but has mostly played LF so far in his career. I think he's arby eligible, so it's not like the Cubs will free salary or anything. In short, I'd probably pass.

Posted
What if we could get Mench for Mitre and Leicester? Both pitchers are out of options and likely are no longer in the Cubs immediate plans. We could end up losing both pitchers to a waiver claim at the end of spring training.

 

While I doubt Mitre and Leicester are near enough to get the Rangers to bite, it surely isn't a bad offer if the Rangers can get Mitre to work consistently in the zone.

 

Mench isn't a horrible option, but I'll agree he isn't the best. I'd rather have Giles for rightfield, but trading for Mench would give us insurance in the case we can't sign or trade for a bigger name.

 

I'd trade for him under those circumstances Vance but he just seems to be a Murton type player with a little more power and a little less OBP. One thing I would do is find out what pitchers are coveted by the teams that have impact bats first and go from there. If Mitre or Leicester have drawn interest from the Phils I would give them the first shot.

Posted

I'd rather have Giles for rightfield, but trading for Mench would give us insurance in the case we can't sign or trade for a bigger name.

 

This is a tactic I'd like to see the Cubs employ. Fill the spot, then go looking for something better. It might take away the stink of absolute desperation.

Posted
The Cubs also could overwhelm the Rangers will volume of players who likely will have to be exposed to waivers. Mitre, Leicester, Wellemeyer- all are out of options and all might not make the Opening Day roster. Add to these some of the rule V casualties and you might get the Rangers to bite based on volume alone. Much depends on how budget concious the Rangers are.
Posted
I'd rather have Giles for rightfield, but trading for Mench would give us insurance in the case we can't sign or trade for a bigger name.

 

This is a tactic I'd like to see the Cubs employ. Fill the spot, then go looking for something better. It might take away the stink of absolute desperation.

 

Sammy really tied Hendry's hands last year IMO. I don't think he'll wait so long to fill the spot and I agree it would be wonderful to have a bat like Mench as the 4th OF.

Posted
The Cubs also could overwhelm the Rangers will volume of players who likely will have to be exposed to waivers. Mitre, Leicester, Wellemeyer- all are out of options and all might not make the Opening Day roster. Add to these some of the rule V casualties and you might get the Rangers to bite based on volume alone. Much depends on how budget concious the Rangers are.

 

offer them a bunch of junk and they'll bite? they do have their own 40 man roster, you know.

Posted
Do you think that trading T walk for a poss 4th OF ( we may already have that with Patterson or Murton depending on production) is value?. I agree with the ideas of Mitre or Leicester due to there options. I think Walker coupled with Hill or J williams could net us something very good.
Posted
The Cubs also could overwhelm the Rangers will volume of players who likely will have to be exposed to waivers. Mitre, Leicester, Wellemeyer- all are out of options and all might not make the Opening Day roster. Add to these some of the rule V casualties and you might get the Rangers to bite based on volume alone. Much depends on how budget concious the Rangers are.

 

offer them a bunch of junk and they'll bite? they do have their own 40 man roster, you know.

 

I agree it is doubtful they would bite. I think a lot depends on how badly they need to move Mench and what other teams are offering. Mitre would be an excellent starting point. He's shown enough promise to interest teams, but he's likely going to be a casualty at the end of spring training. Waiting until then to deal him likely lowers his value.

Posted
For Mench, they can have Patterson plus: one from the out-of-options crowd (Mitre, Wellemeyer, Leicester) OR one from the Rule 5 eligible bunch (Brownlie, Marmol, Marshall, Nolasco, Ryu).
Posted
I don't see anything special about Mench. Surely with the money we have to spend, we can do better than this for right field.
Posted
A .874 ops in 2004 caught my attention. Most likely the Cubs would have to give up either Williams or Hill. Not a bad option.

 

For this guy...really? I don't see trading a decent 3-5 guy like Williams for a possible 4th OF guy.

Posted
A .874 ops in 2004 caught my attention. Most likely the Cubs would have to give up either Williams or Hill. Not a bad option.

 

That OPS is largely SLG-driven though, only a .336 OBP. However, it's not out of the question to see him with a BABIP around .290, which gives him a .290/.350/.500ish line. Solid, but I'd like to aim higher than Mench to start out with. Unless of course you acquire Mench, then use him or Murton as a chip in getting a better OF.

Posted
A .874 ops in 2004 caught my attention. Most likely the Cubs would have to give up either Williams or Hill. Not a bad option.

 

That OPS is largely SLG-driven though, only a .336 OBP. However, it's not out of the question to see him with a BABIP around .290, which gives him a .290/.350/.500ish line. Solid, but I'd like to aim higher than Mench to start out with. Unless of course you acquire Mench, then use him or Murton as a chip in getting a better OF.

 

Do you see Mench as a better player than Murton? Could the Cubs sign and trade Mench in a bigger deal?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...