kujay wrote: Sammy Sofa wrote: Wilson A2000 wrote:
Derwood wrote:WHY WON'T NOBAMA SAY THE WORDS "MUSLIM EXTREMISTS "?
You would think they would at least debate Obama's reason for not saying that Muslim terrorists aren't actually Muslim, but instead they keep asking the question
Because there's nothing to legitimately debate; it's something pushed by idiots who get rigid at the moronic idea of some kind of completely unrealistic war between Christianity/the West and Islam. In their minds practically every Muslim is a potential threat, and anybody who doesn't descend to that kind of moronic rhetoric is just some kind of secret Muslim coddling terrorists or some such nonsense. Anyone with two functioning brain cells knows that DAESH and their ilk see themselves as religiously driven or mandated, so it should be painfully obvious that the only reason someone wants to hear the president "admitting" that they're [expletive] up Muslims is because it validates their own fear and hatred of almost any Muslim.
I have a conservative friend whose two biggest rants about politics right now are this and the focus on climate change as a national security concern.
To him, it's simple. Deport all the muslims.
Yeah, I've seen a number of people running with the standard GOP criticism of Obama's climate change rhetoric to the point that they're basically saying this happened BECAUSE he's "too focused" on climate change, like a president is supposed to be some kind of simple dolt who can only work on one thing at a time.
Though given the currently candidate field, maybe that IS the best they can hope for.