www.northsidebaseball.com

The place for discussion about the Chicago Cubs
It is currently Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:52 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 331 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:05 pm 
Offline
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:41 am
Posts: 12987
Location: Baseball Hell
So what about:

Cubs get Brad Hawpe
Braves get Milton Bradley(they want a righty bat)
Rockies get Derrek Lowe(assuming he waives his NTC)

Id assume wed have to send a prospect or 2 to one of the other teams as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 
google adsense
Post details
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:11 pm 
Offline
5-Time All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:43 am
Posts: 8424
Location: Iowa City, IA
The Rockies can get WAY better than Derek Lowe.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:18 pm 
Offline
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 9:32 pm
Posts: 4169
West Side Rooter wrote:
So what about:

Cubs get Brad Hawpe
Braves get Milton Bradley(they want a righty bat)
Rockies get Derrek Lowe(assuming he waives his NTC)

Id assume wed have to send a prospect or 2 to one of the other teams as well.


I would think there would be some big-time money going to the Rockies from the Braves and/or the Cubs.
Millions owed:
Lowe - $15, $15, $15
Bradley - $9, $12
Hawpe - $7.5, $10 (club option that Hawpe can waive if traded)

Maybe Cubs send Rockies $3 million and Braves send Rockies $13 million ($2 million in 2010, $3 million in 2011, $8 million in 2012)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:04 am 
Offline
5-Time All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:33 am
Posts: 9280
Location: <insert local pub>
For reasons that I don't quite understand, some people still don't get this.

Brad Hawpe is so god awful in the field that, if we assume Sam Fuld can play a league average CF on defense, he would only have to hit approximately .260/.320/.350 in the same number of plate appearances to have the same amount of value Hawpe had this season. He would also cost seven million dollars less, plus the cost of prospects in the trade.

I'm not saying we need to make Sam Fuld our CF.

I am saying that Brad Hawpe is an abysmal option for filling the hole in our OF. If I see another idiot suggest trading for him after how many times I've explained how terrible he is, my head may pop.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:19 am 
Offline
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:41 am
Posts: 12987
Location: Baseball Hell
My real feeling is that if we cant get what we really want, rather than sign another Jeromy Burnitz or Todd Hollandsworth, between Johnson, Fuld, Fox, Hoffpauir, and Brad Snyder, we have a 3rd outfielder, and when the time comes, if necessary, we can make a mid season trade. Otherwise, were more than likely looking at a downgrade from Bradley. The other options are:

David DeJesus who may or may need be an upgrade over Reed Johnson
Mike Cameron, who wed over pay for, and wed probably be on the books for him and whatever we eat of Bradleys
Brad Hawpe, who cant play defense
Pat Burrell who really cant play defense
Gary Matthews Jr. who cant play baseball
a whole host of other over the hillers than Hendry would love the opportunity to over pay for IE Ken Griffey Jr, Garrett Anderson, Jermaine Dye


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:40 am 
Offline
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 9:32 pm
Posts: 4169
West Side Rooter wrote:
My real feeling is that if we cant get what we really want, rather than sign another Jeromy Burnitz or Todd Hollandsworth, between Johnson, Fuld, Fox, Hoffpauir, and Brad Snyder, we have a 3rd outfielder, and when the time comes, if necessary, we can make a mid season trade. Otherwise, were more than likely looking at a downgrade from Bradley. The other options are:

David DeJesus who may or may need be an upgrade over Reed Johnson
Mike Cameron, who wed over pay for, and wed probably be on the books for him and whatever we eat of Bradleys
Brad Hawpe, who cant play defense
Pat Burrell who really cant play defense
Gary Matthews Jr. who cant play baseball
a whole host of other over the hillers than Hendry would love the opportunity to over pay for IE Ken Griffey Jr, Garrett Anderson, Jermaine Dye


With Johnson, Fuld, Fox, Hoffpauir, and Snyder manning RF, we probably won't need a midseason trade because we'll be out of contention. Any of those guys might do a decent job for a week or two, but not on a regular basis.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:13 am 
Offline
Superstar

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:38 pm
Posts: 17914
Backtobanks wrote:
West Side Rooter wrote:
My real feeling is that if we cant get what we really want, rather than sign another Jeromy Burnitz or Todd Hollandsworth, between Johnson, Fuld, Fox, Hoffpauir, and Brad Snyder, we have a 3rd outfielder, and when the time comes, if necessary, we can make a mid season trade. Otherwise, were more than likely looking at a downgrade from Bradley. The other options are:

David DeJesus who may or may need be an upgrade over Reed Johnson
Mike Cameron, who wed over pay for, and wed probably be on the books for him and whatever we eat of Bradleys
Brad Hawpe, who cant play defense
Pat Burrell who really cant play defense
Gary Matthews Jr. who cant play baseball
a whole host of other over the hillers than Hendry would love the opportunity to over pay for IE Ken Griffey Jr, Garrett Anderson, Jermaine Dye


With Johnson, Fuld, Fox, Hoffpauir, and Snyder manning RF, we probably won't need a midseason trade because we'll be out of contention. Any of those guys might do a decent job for a week or two, but not on a regular basis.


Yeah, not only are those guys in no way shape or form a 3rd OF, but the first half of the season does count. You don't purposefully go into a season with a weak position you plan on fixing later. 2/3 of the season is done by the time the trading deadline approaches. If you spend 2/3 of the season with such incompetence in the everyday lineup you're deliberately sabotaging your season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:33 am 
Offline
Superstar

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 7:14 pm
Posts: 12825
Location: Tennessee
I'd still very happily take Cameron if Bradley is traded.

_________________
Freedom means the freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. Freedom means the freedom to make bad choices and suffer the consequences, and the freedom to make good choices and enjoy the rewards.
Neal Boortz


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:42 am 
Offline
5-Time All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:43 am
Posts: 8424
Location: Iowa City, IA
Yeah, Mike Cameron is still quite solid despite some posters putting their hands over their ears and pretending he's not.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:16 pm 
Offline
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 9:32 pm
Posts: 4169
I wonder what it would take to sign Marlon Byrd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:35 pm 
Offline
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 11:30 am
Posts: 2970
Location: Vienna, VA
Backtobanks wrote:
I wonder what it would take to sign Marlon Byrd.


Hopefully, more than the Cubs are willing to pay.

_________________
Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:54 pm 
Offline
Starter

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:12 pm
Posts: 817
Location: Memphis, Tn
Is this an actual rumor?

Alex (Chicago)


Marlon Byrd to the Cubs? I hope this happens and it would make sense since it would allow Fukudome to move back to his natural position. Do you think there is a chance this could happen?

Jayson Stark (1:39 PM)


I think Marlon Byrd is going to be one of the most attractive under-the-radar free agents out there. And the Cubs make sense. They're definitley in the market for a righthanded-hitting outfielder who can play center and allow them to move Fukudome back to right. And the list of free agents who can do that is awfully short.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:01 pm 
Offline
5-Time All-Star

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 7:10 pm
Posts: 6473
Location: Maryland's Eastern Shore
Since when are the Cubs looking for RH hitters?

_________________
Casey 3/8/03


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:10 pm 
Offline
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 11:30 am
Posts: 2970
Location: Vienna, VA
nick23 wrote:
Is this an actual rumor?

Alex (Chicago)


Marlon Byrd to the Cubs? I hope this happens and it would make sense since it would allow Fukudome to move back to his natural position. Do you think there is a chance this could happen?

Jayson Stark (1:39 PM)


I think Marlon Byrd is going to be one of the most attractive under-the-radar free agents out there. And the Cubs make sense. They're definitley in the market for a righthanded-hitting outfielder who can play center and allow them to move Fukudome back to right. And the list of free agents who can do that is awfully short.


It's not like Marlon Byrd is some gold-glove centerfielder, and away from Texas he's a mid-.700s OPS hitter. He's also coming off a career highs in the power categories and will want a multi-year deal for more than he's worth.

_________________
Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:26 pm 
Offline
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:37 pm
Posts: 2261
Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Haven't looked to see if this has been discussed here, but if you want pitching help in a deal for Milton, while swapping bad contracts... what about ...

Any two of Jeremy Bonderman and/or Dontrelle Willis and/or Nate Robertson for M.B. ???

Bonderman/Willis is insurance for Lilly and the rotation on the whole, while Robertson is a lefty for the 'pen.

Bonderman (1/$12.5M)
Willis (1/$12M)
Robertson (1/$10M)

_________________
Image
Facebook | MyMiniCity | Twitter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:50 am 
Offline
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 9:38 pm
Posts: 19819
Location: San Diego
biittner77 wrote:
Since when are the Cubs looking for RH hitters?


Left handed hitters was last year's flavor of the month.

That's another one we can cross off the list along with:

Played in a World Series
Can catch the ball
Need speedy top of the order hitters

What am I forgetting? It must be the Dusty Dice. It seems as though it landed on "Need speedy top of the order hitters" again.

_________________
Member Guidelines


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:53 am 
Offline
Hall of Fame
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 11:44 am
Posts: 42972
Location: 375 Miles East of Wrigley
But the Yankees won the WS without a speedy lead-off hitter, so that has to be off the table.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:20 pm 
Offline
Starter

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 919
Location: Oxford, OH
Southpaw19 wrote:
Haven't looked to see if this has been discussed here, but if you want pitching help in a deal for Milton, while swapping bad contracts... what about ...

Any two of Jeremy Bonderman and/or Dontrelle Willis and/or Nate Robertson for M.B. ???

Bonderman/Willis is insurance for Lilly and the rotation on the whole, while Robertson is a lefty for the 'pen.

Bonderman (1/$12.5M)
Willis (1/$12M)
Robertson (1/$10M)

Willis is done but I'd definitely take a shot at Bonderman. It would be interesting to see if Rothschild could get something out of him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:35 pm 
Offline
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 3:56 pm
Posts: 2356
Derwood wrote:
But the Yankees won the WS without a speedy lead-off hitter, so that has to be off the table.


Speedy is an interpretation and probably not completely accurate to what the Cubs front office desires. I just chalk this up to Pierre hang-over around here.

I'm sure Hendry takes 30/35 SB and generally smart base running any day of the week, despite merely above-average speed (which reflects Jeter and his 2009 numbers).

_________________
"Get your diplomas boys, everybody's graduating tonight!" --Vin Scully, 4/17/2006, describing Maddux's masterful game against the Dodgers after he struck out Dioner Navarro to end the eighth.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:07 pm 
Offline
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 8:48 pm
Posts: 14032
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Derwood wrote:
But the Yankees won the WS without a speedy lead-off hitter, so that has to be off the table.


exceptions can be made when your leadoff hitter is derek [expletive] jeter. duh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:53 pm 
Offline
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 10:42 pm
Posts: 19654
Location: near Raleigh, NC
BigbadB wrote:
biittner77 wrote:
Since when are the Cubs looking for RH hitters?


Left handed hitters was last year's flavor of the month.

That's another one we can cross off the list along with:

Played in a World Series
Can catch the ball
Need speedy top of the order hitters

What am I forgetting? It must be the Dusty Dice. It seems as though it landed on "Need speedy top of the order hitters" again.
I think the one you're forgetting is character. That seemed to be the theme following 2004 when trading Sosa seemed to be the entire offseason emphasis. That's what's re-surfacing this year with Bradley.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:35 am 
Offline
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 9:32 pm
Posts: 4169
I know the Braves are trying to move Lowe or Vazquez, but Kawakami might be an interesting target if they would take Bradley. Kawakami can start or relieve and is owed $6.7 million for each of the next two years. He's not great, but he might be a better option than some other names floating around. Bradley would be an upgrade in the OF for the Braves and they could still trade Vazquez for a bigger bat.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:17 am 
Offline
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:41 am
Posts: 12987
Location: Baseball Hell
Quote:
Cubs Talk: Bradley, Trades vs. Free Agency
By Mike Axisa [November 9 at 8:57am CST]
The GM meetings kick off today in Chicago, though free agents are stuck talking only to their current team until November 20th. As a result, the days ahead figure to be filled with plenty of trade talk, and Milton Bradley is certainly one of the higher profile players on the block. It's only natural that his name popped up this morning.

We heard back in October that "multiple teams are in contact with the Cubs" about Bradley, and now a source tells Gordon Wittenmyer of The Chicago Sun Times that "at least three more interested parties contacted the Cubs in the last week or so." Wittenmyer also mentions the Cubbies figure to be more involved in trades than free agency this winter.

''I think you'll see a lot of that,'' Hendry said. ''At the same time, I think the free-agent world will be a patient market like it ended up being last year, and some good players will probably be available as the winter progresses. We'll be looking to trade some pieces to get some pieces.''


Heres the latest from MLBTR. Nothing groundbreaking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:45 am 
Offline
Superstar

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 7:14 pm
Posts: 12825
Location: Tennessee
West Side Rooter wrote:
Quote:
Cubs Talk: Bradley, Trades vs. Free Agency
By Mike Axisa [November 9 at 8:57am CST]

We heard back in October that "multiple teams are in contact with the Cubs" about Bradley, and now a source tells Gordon Wittenmyer of The Chicago Sun Times that "at least three more interested parties contacted the Cubs in the last week or so."


Heres the latest from MLBTR. Nothing groundbreaking.


This is actually very good news, I think. The more teams interested, the better.

_________________
Freedom means the freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. Freedom means the freedom to make bad choices and suffer the consequences, and the freedom to make good choices and enjoy the rewards.
Neal Boortz


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rosenthal: Multiple teams after Bradley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:28 am 
Offline
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:44 pm
Posts: 1143
Location: Albion, Indiana
As for the Cubs, Hendry suddenly is facing pitching issues, what with Rich Harden having filed for free agency and Ted Lilly set to open the 2010 season on the disabled list after having arthroscopic surgery on his left shoulder last week.

Harden, who made 26 big-league starts this year, has a history of shoulder problems, and mainly for that reason, it's hard to see the Cubs offering him salary arbitration and bringing him back for $8 million to $10 million for one year.

Not to be forgotten is that Hendry still is trying to unload right fielder Milton Bradley, whom he suspended for conduct detrimental to the team with two weeks left in the 2009 season.

Bradley has two years and $21 million left on the three-year, $30 million deal Hendry gave him last January.

One interesting scenario has new Toronto Blue Jays GM Alex Anthopoulos indicating he'd be open to trading ace pitcher Roy Halladay, who becomes a free agent next fall after he's scheduled to make $15.75 million in 2010.

Halladay has a no-trade clause in his contract, but he's said he'd like to play for a contender, and the Cubs seem closer to getting back to the playoffs than do the Blue Jays. To get Halladay, the Cubs must move money.

Could Hendry package Bradley and prospects for Halladay? Bradley could thrive in the relatively quiet environs of Toronto, and Halladay would provide an instant jolt to the Cubs' rotation.

A deal isn't likely this week, but GM meetings can be the place to put the wheels in motion. Hendry and assistant GM Randy Bush will be heading to O'Hare fresh off the team's organization meetings in Arizona.

"We were very pleased with the way the organization meetings went," Hendry said Sunday. "We had a chance to meet the Ricketts family, and we feel they are going to be tremendous owners for the city of Chicago.

"Randy and I are working to make the club better, and maybe we can start some of that dialogue this week."

http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=335062&src=152

_________________
"We shouldn't be surprised by that at this point. It's a baseball, CATCH IT!!" Bob Brenly 07-20-09


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 331 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group