CubinNY wrote:Mark Prior syndrome is my diagnosis. He'll be doing the towel drill by the end of ST.
the Cardinals of the last few years remind me some of the 04-07 Cubs
CubinNY wrote:Mark Prior syndrome is my diagnosis. He'll be doing the towel drill by the end of ST.
Brian wrote:The Cardinals brought in Goldschmidt and Dexter in the 8th inning of spring training game to try to not get no-hit. Is that the most meatball thing that has happened in a spring training game?
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:extending a 32 year old first baseman what could go wrong
The_Achiever wrote:Transmogrified Tiger wrote:extending a 32 year old first baseman what could go wrong
Eh, 31.
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:extending a 32 year old first baseman what could go wrong
Duke Silver wrote:You've never been right about anything. You bitch and moan at the slightest hint of things not going right ... Suck my ass, you whiny little bitch.
David wrote:i get lamenting our horsefeathers owners and boring ass offseason completely.
what i don't get is all the pining for/props to even horsefeathers organizations who spend even less (and cry poor much more loudly) and are just happening to do things right now.
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:extending a 32 year old first baseman what could go wrong
Bertz wrote:I'm positive that we're all going to hate Goldschmidt and he's going to absolutely wreck our lefty heavy rotation, but...this seems like a pretty player friendly deal? Like, would he even have gotten $130m this winter? I doubt it, and now the Cards are committing to that a year out. Also, if they were willing to do this, why not just sign Machado and slide Carpenter over to first?
Bryant's Disco Ball wrote:For the Cubs fans here who are cheering against the Cubs now, are you happy about this deal or upset by it?
The Logan wrote:Bryant's Disco Ball wrote:For the Cubs fans here who are cheering against the Cubs now, are you happy about this deal or upset by it?
Paul Goldschmidt does not strike me as the type of player who loses all baseball talent in his early thirties. There are some players who baffle me. Guys who seemingly fall off a cliff in the middle of their prime years. Goldschmidt has always been great. A good batting eye doesn't go away with age and he seems like he's got the physicality to maintain his strengths without losing a step well into his mid 30's. I think he remains his usual productive self for the majority of this contract. Because of this, I'm upset he's on the Cardinals.
Bryant's Disco Ball wrote:The Logan wrote:Bryant's Disco Ball wrote:For the Cubs fans here who are cheering against the Cubs now, are you happy about this deal or upset by it?
Paul Goldschmidt does not strike me as the type of player who loses all baseball talent in his early thirties. There are some players who baffle me. Guys who seemingly fall off a cliff in the middle of their prime years. Goldschmidt has always been great. A good batting eye doesn't go away with age and he seems like he's got the physicality to maintain his strengths without losing a step well into his mid 30's. I think he remains his usual productive self for the majority of this contract. Because of this, I'm upset he's on the Cardinals.
If what you say is true, the answer is it makes them happy then.
ETA: Although Cubs fans who now are cheering against the Cubs probably still hate the Cardinals, too.
17 Seconds wrote:the cardinals have been a horsefeathers the last 2 years and somehow they like already caught back up to us
17 Seconds wrote:the cardinals have been a horsefeathers the last 2 years and somehow they like already caught back up to us
Return to “General Baseball Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests