Page 1 of 61

The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 5:07 pm
by jersey cubs fan

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 5:51 pm
by Ding Dong Johnson
1, 2, skip a few, 99, 100!

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 6:01 pm
by David
jersey cubs fan wrote:


Obviously, you're posting it because that guy is a dummy, but yeah. Either that's a really old post by that guy, or that guy just misread the odds and was looking at the opening odds, which almost match what he's saying.

http://espn.go.com/chalk/story/_/id/145 ... -superbook

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 6:35 pm
by treebird
David wrote:
jersey cubs fan wrote:


Obviously, you're posting it because that guy is a dummy, but yeah. Either that's a really old post by that guy, or that guy just misread the odds and was looking at the opening odds, which almost match what he's saying.

http://espn.go.com/chalk/story/_/id/145 ... -superbook


D.A.V.I.D. ERROR REPORTING SYSTEM

i think somebody emptied the coffee pot on his logic board again

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 6:37 pm
by David
treebird wrote:
David wrote:
jersey cubs fan wrote:


Obviously, you're posting it because that guy is a dummy, but yeah. Either that's a really old post by that guy, or that guy just misread the odds and was looking at the opening odds, which almost match what he's saying.

http://espn.go.com/chalk/story/_/id/145 ... -superbook


D.A.V.I.D. ERROR REPORTING SYSTEM

i think somebody emptied the coffee pot on his logic board again


huh?

i got the point of the post. i just questioned the odds themselves so I went to look it up.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 6:40 pm
by treebird
David wrote:
treebird wrote:
David wrote:
Obviously, you're posting it because that guy is a dummy, but yeah. Either that's a really old post by that guy, or that guy just misread the odds and was looking at the opening odds, which almost match what he's saying.

http://espn.go.com/chalk/story/_/id/145 ... -superbook


D.A.V.I.D. ERROR REPORTING SYSTEM

i think somebody emptied the coffee pot on his logic board again


huh?

i got the point of the post. i just questioned the odds themselves so I went to look it up.


INITIATE REBOOT SEQUENCE

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 6:49 pm
by Bull
This David as a robot thing has gone through the funny/not funny cycle multiple times and gets more funny and more not funny every time around.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 6:51 pm
by David
Bull wrote:This David as a robot thing has gone through the funny/not funny cycle multiple times and gets more funny and more not funny every time around.


the best part was that, iirc, it started because i didn't understand why someone would want to beat up a pitcher for hitting someone in the face instead of being upset/distraught over their friend getting hit in the face

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:49 pm
by Sammy Sofa
I thought it was mostly for the C-3P0-stype killjoy posts like the one above.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:53 pm
by David
yeah, you know me, the ultimate kill joy!

otoh, if ridiculing a definition of sandwiches under which subs and italian beef aren't considered sandwiches (not to mention crazies that eat syrup-less waffles), then killjoy i will be.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:55 pm
by Sammy Sofa
Plus the weird, miscalculated, Careless-like bouts of emotional outbursts.

It makes you more lovable, quite frankly.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:56 pm
by Sammy Sofa
I picture you looking like the robot from Buck Rogers when you're happy and the nightmare-'bot from The Black Hole when you rage.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:01 pm
by David
Sammy Sofa wrote:Plus the weird, miscalculated, Careless-like bouts of emotional outbursts.

It makes you more lovable, quite frankly.


you take my posts too seriously if this is what you think is happening

i just like making fun of people

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:01 pm
by David
Sammy Sofa wrote:I picture you looking like the robot from Buck Rogers when you're happy and the nightmare-'bot from The Black Hole when you rage.


i don't get either of these references

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:16 pm
by Sammy Sofa
Image

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:35 pm
by NOLA
Robot's got a name dammit. He's Twiki.
And he's carrying Dr. Theopolis. He's Greek.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 12:24 am
by UMFan83
This thread needs more Cardinals bashing

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 12:48 am
by Duke Silver
David wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:I picture you looking like the robot from Buck Rogers when you're happy and the nightmare-'bot from The Black Hole when you rage.


i don't get either of these references


Image

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 1:43 am
by Sammy Sofa
Image

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 3:40 am
by NonProfitCow
Spoiler: show
Image

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 3:56 am
by Cubfanintheknow
NonProfitCow wrote:
Spoiler: show
Image


This video will never, ever get old.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 3:58 am
by NonProfitCow
sneaky mods are sneaky

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 11:03 am
by StylesClash
Speaking of odds, anyone have an idea when Divisional odds will be released? Nearly all the big name free agents are signed, and the odds of anymore big trades occurring before the start of the regular season are fairly slim.

Also anyone care to speculate on what the odds of the Cubs winning the Central will be? It's pretty much a two horse race for the title, with Chicago as favorites, so I would think maybe +120.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 3:55 pm
by mul21
Sammy Sofa wrote:I picture you looking like the robot from Buck Rogers when you're happy and the nightmare-'bot from The Black Hole when you rage.


I picture him as the Joan Rivers robot from Spaceballs.

Re: The Cardinals

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 4:29 am
by seanimal
David wrote:yeah, you know me, the ultimate kill joy!

otoh, if ridiculing a definition of sandwiches under which subs and italian beef aren't considered sandwiches (not to mention crazies that eat syrup-less waffles), then killjoy i will be.


i think you mean kilroy, mr. roboto