Andy wrote:You have to look at the comparisons. NFL's union, for instance, has been arguing against more than 16 games for years, and then the owners offered to spend, like, a fraction of a half a percent more on player salaries in exchange for a 17th game (which will inevitably become demands for an 18th game in a few years), and the union folded like a cheap suit. The MLBPA screwed up the last CBA, but at least they're not folding.
"strong in comparison" still isn't that strong. They may not fold but the owners will always play a media war accusing the players of being spoiled little rich kids playing a game everyone wants to play. Meanwhile, the union repeatedly fails to convey the same "rich person" war against the owners. As someone who, for the most -part, supports unions its frustrating.