The version of the board software has been updated. If you want to use a different theme (currently only subsilver is available), please do the following:

1) click your name in the upper right
2) click user control panel
3) go to the board preferences tab
4) Change from prosilver to subsilver
5) click submit.

Vote for #4 Prospect

Vote for #4 Prospect

Poll ended at Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:20 pm

Gioskar Amaya
0
No votes
Brett Jackson
0
No votes
Pierce Johnson
0
No votes
Junior Lake
0
No votes
Dillon Maples
1
2%
Juan Paniagua
0
No votes
Matt Szczur
0
No votes
Ronald Torreyes
0
No votes
Duane Underwood
0
No votes
Christian Villanueva
0
No votes
Josh Vitters
1
2%
Arodys Vizcaino
47
82%
Dan Vogelbach
8
14%
 
Total votes: 57

User avatar
Tim
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37901
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Naperville, IL
Contact:
Status: Offline

Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Tim » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:20 pm

Please vote for the Cubs #4 prospect (serious votes only, please!). Please post your rationale below.

If someone convinces you that someone else should be higher, please feel free to change your vote anytime between now and Thursday.

Also, since the overall discussion thread points towards there being three realistic candidates for each of the next three spots, I'm only allowing one vote at a time right now. As we get to #5 and later, I'll allow multiple choices per vote.

Results so far:

#1: Javier Baez
#2: Jorge Soler
#3: Albert Almora

User avatar
Tim
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37901
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Naperville, IL
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Tim » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:38 pm

Is the person who voted for Vogelbach that excited about his offensive potential or that worried about Vizcaino's health?

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 29794
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:39 pm

Tim wrote:Is the person who voted for Vogelbach that excited about his offensive potential or that worried about Vizcaino's health?


Yes. Mostly the first one.

And while Vizcaino is being painted as nearly ready, he has like 23 innings above AA.

User avatar
Tim
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37901
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Naperville, IL
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Tim » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:42 pm

KyleJRM wrote:
Tim wrote:Is the person who voted for Vogelbach that excited about his offensive potential or that worried about Vizcaino's health?


Yes. Mostly the first one.

Definitely understandable on both counts. I was tempted to vote for Vogelbach myself, actually. If I thought he were going to be able to provide any positive value on defense or basepaths, I would have done so. But I keep picturing how Fielder isn't worth nearly as much as his offense would lead you to believe because of those factors. I think Vogelbach will be at least as bad as Fielder on those two counts and Prince is the absolute top end of projections for him as a hitter.

User avatar
Tim
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37901
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Naperville, IL
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Tim » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:43 pm

KyleJRM wrote:
Tim wrote:Is the person who voted for Vogelbach that excited about his offensive potential or that worried about Vizcaino's health?


Yes. Mostly the first one.

And while Vizcaino is being painted as nearly ready, he has like 23 innings above AA.

Just saw your edit...

It's a good thing that he'll likely spend at least the first half in Iowa, then.

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 29794
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:44 pm

Tim wrote:Definitely understandable on both counts. I was tempted to vote for Vogelbach myself, actually. If I thought he were going to be able to provide any positive value on defense or basepaths, I would have done so. But I keep picturing how Fielder isn't worth nearly as much as his offense would lead you to believe because of those factors. I think Vogelbach will be at least as bad as Fielder on those two counts and Prince is the absolute top end of projections for him as a hitter.


Part of me wants to just chuck WAR out entirely because I'm not at all convinced it's properly weighing offense and defense.

User avatar
Rob
Superstar
Posts: 12671
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:33 am
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Rob » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:44 pm

KyleJRM wrote:
Tim wrote:Is the person who voted for Vogelbach that excited about his offensive potential or that worried about Vizcaino's health?


Yes. Mostly the first one.

And while Vizcaino is being painted as nearly ready, he has like 23 innings above AA.


And if somebody views Vizcaino ultimately as a pen arm, it's pretty easy to lean towards Vogelbach.

I'm undecided, myself. But I find it odd Tim was so surprised to see a non-Vizcaino vote. This one warrants real consideration.

Edit: perhaps Tim was just trying to stimulate conversation.

User avatar
Tim
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37901
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Naperville, IL
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Tim » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:46 pm

KyleJRM wrote:
Tim wrote:Definitely understandable on both counts. I was tempted to vote for Vogelbach myself, actually. If I thought he were going to be able to provide any positive value on defense or basepaths, I would have done so. But I keep picturing how Fielder isn't worth nearly as much as his offense would lead you to believe because of those factors. I think Vogelbach will be at least as bad as Fielder on those two counts and Prince is the absolute top end of projections for him as a hitter.


Part of me wants to just chuck WAR out entirely because I'm not at all convinced it's properly weighing offense and defense.

Whether you take WAR as gospel or not, though, it's pretty evident that Fielder gives value back on the bases and on the field. It was pretty shocking looking at how few bases he advances versus other runners.

User avatar
Rob
Superstar
Posts: 12671
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:33 am
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Rob » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:47 pm

Vogelbach doesn't necessarily have to have defensive value. His prospect value takes a nice leap in the AL, and it's likely his ultimate benefit to the Cubs is as trade bait.

User avatar
Tim
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37901
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Naperville, IL
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Tim » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:49 pm

Rob wrote:
KyleJRM wrote:
Tim wrote:Is the person who voted for Vogelbach that excited about his offensive potential or that worried about Vizcaino's health?


Yes. Mostly the first one.

And while Vizcaino is being painted as nearly ready, he has like 23 innings above AA.


And if somebody views Vizcaino ultimately as a pen arm, it's pretty easy to lean towards Vogelbach.

I'm undecided, myself. But I find it odd Tim was so surprised to see a non-Vizcaino vote. This one warrants real consideration.

Edit: perhaps Tim was just trying to stimulate conversation.

I both expected to see Vizcaino dominate and I like there to be discussion about the choices.

Curious to see TT's post on people picking Vogelbach over Vizcaino, though.

User avatar
jersey cubs fan
Hall of Fame
Posts: 46114
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:38 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby jersey cubs fan » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:57 pm

I think I'd like to find any reason to vote for somebody other than Vizcaino, because a currently rehabbing post op 22 year old with less than 270 innings over 5 years as a pro leaves me with all sorts of doubts. But nobody else in the system is interesting enough to consider.

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Hall of Fame
Posts: 46971
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:23 am
Location: Greater Chicagoland
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Transmogrified Tiger » Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:07 pm

Tim wrote:
Rob wrote:
KyleJRM wrote:
Tim wrote:Is the person who voted for Vogelbach that excited about his offensive potential or that worried about Vizcaino's health?


Yes. Mostly the first one.

And while Vizcaino is being painted as nearly ready, he has like 23 innings above AA.


And if somebody views Vizcaino ultimately as a pen arm, it's pretty easy to lean towards Vogelbach.

I'm undecided, myself. But I find it odd Tim was so surprised to see a non-Vizcaino vote. This one warrants real consideration.

Edit: perhaps Tim was just trying to stimulate conversation.

I both expected to see Vizcaino dominate and I like there to be discussion about the choices.

Curious to see TT's post on people picking Vogelbach over Vizcaino, though.


Lunatics, the lot of 'em.


Really though, I'm not 100% sold on Vizcaino as a super-stud or anything like that. But he's been very good, and I'm more confident in the success rate of Tommy John than I am the success rate of teenagers who hit in Boise/Peoria making it through to Chicago without busting or having their ceiling drastically lowered. I just think Vizcaino is a bit underrated because he's not the prospect Delgado is, he didn't come up through the system, and we haven't had any experience with him since he was acquired. Put his career to date entirely in a Cub uniform and I think you'd see him ranked differently is all.

User avatar
Slide Castro Slide
Formerly West Side Rooter
Posts: 24186
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:41 am
Location: Baseball Hell
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Slide Castro Slide » Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:21 pm

Vizcaino. A 100% healthy Vizcaino would be in the question for 1-3, but then again, we never would have acquired a 100% healthy Vizcaino for scraps.

User avatar
CaliforniaRaisin
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 84016
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 8:20 am
Location: Pasadena, CA
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby CaliforniaRaisin » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:23 pm

Vizcaino for me too.

User avatar
Stannis
RIP Sulley
Posts: 42093
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:17 am
Location: Winterfell
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Stannis » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:24 pm

Tim wrote:Is the person who voted for Vogelbach that excited about his offensive potential or that worried about Vizcaino's health?


i voted for vogelbach because i think he is a unique hitter in terms of power potential.
the sound of the warhorn died away...a drum began to beat...And a name passed from the lips of each man to the next, written in small white puffs of breath. Stannis, they whispered, Stannis is here, Stannis is come, Stannis, Stannis, Stannis.

jumbo
Starter
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 6:37 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby jumbo » Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:09 pm

CaliforniaRaisin wrote:Vizcaino for me too.


Me, too
Next pick gets more exciting

User avatar
rawaction
Hall of Fame
Posts: 30899
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 5:04 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby rawaction » Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:10 pm

Very intrigued by Vogelbach, but he needs to hit in high A before I stop having flashbacks of Brian Dopirak.

User avatar
Rob
Superstar
Posts: 12671
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:33 am
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Rob » Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:22 pm

I voted for Vizcaino, but I think Vogelbach should be closer than he is.

I am a bit disappointed in the fact my inner monologue included a semi-convincing argument for Junior Lake's all-tools / no-polish approach this early in the list.

User avatar
Tim
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37901
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Naperville, IL
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Tim » Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:41 pm

I might just have to look in the DB to see who voted for Vitters.

User avatar
CaliforniaRaisin
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 84016
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 8:20 am
Location: Pasadena, CA
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby CaliforniaRaisin » Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:42 pm

Tim wrote:I might just have to look in the DB to see who voted for Vitters.


I thought it was surely you.

User avatar
Tim
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37901
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Naperville, IL
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Tim » Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:43 pm

CaliforniaRaisin wrote:
Tim wrote:I might just have to look in the DB to see who voted for Vitters.


I thought it was surely you.

he's at least a couple down for me. ;)

User avatar
Rob
Superstar
Posts: 12671
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:33 am
Status: Offline

Re: Vote for #4 Prospect

Postby Rob » Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:48 pm

Tim wrote:
CaliforniaRaisin wrote:
Tim wrote:I might just have to look in the DB to see who voted for Vitters.


I thought it was surely you.

he's at least a couple down for me. ;)


I still like him more than most, but he's probably floating around 10 for me.


Return to “Minor Leagues”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: RammyFanny and 5 guests