Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
Derwood wrote:Is Tulsi Gabbard not popping up on people's lists, or are you all too embarrassed to show where she falls?
I am NOT a Gabbard fan, to be clear
She is on the list, but for me not high enough to matter.
Answering a bunch more of the expanded questions didn't do much to change the congestion, but it did change my results.
The site actually does a decent job of breaking down what it thinks of your views vs. the candidates' and how they reflect on the spectrum; I will fully cop to having to take another look at Harris because of this. I really largely dismissed her because of her history as a prosecutor.
And Gabbard was in a really unappealing 87-86-85 Klobuchar-Gabbard-Yang sandwich for me. It's not that surprising; outside of her crappy foreign policy takes, she's not that far off from me on paper. I would imagine that if a question along the lines of, "would you support a candidate who is neck-deep in an insane, abusive, corrupt cult," then she'd probably go plunging down the charts. Same with Klobucahr and they're not being a, "I'm not a fan of someone who routinely abuses their staffs and eats a salad with a comb" option.