gflore34 wrote:Brian wrote:
In some regards, for Rudy, it must be quit liberating and well, fun to be given this opportunity to act like a complete horsefeathering fool on the national stage.
gflore34 wrote:Brian wrote:
UMFan83 wrote:CyHawk_Cub wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:gflore34 wrote:Brian wrote:
In some regards, for Rudy, it must be quit liberating and well, fun to be given this opportunity to act like a complete horsefeathering fool on the national stage.
CyHawk_Cub wrote:
minnesotacubsfan wrote:CyHawk_Cub wrote:
minnesotacubsfan wrote:CyHawk_Cub wrote:
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.
There are two ways to look at this past election and spin it forward. One version is that Trump is a uniquely talented populist demagogue with a decades old image as a fabulously successful businessman. Under that scenario, no other Republican is capable of generating the same sky high turnout among white working class voters that lifted both his campaigns. But there is another more concerning version with which Democrats must wrestle. What if Trump is a uniquely weak candidate? In 2016 and 2020, he underperformed other Republicans on the ballot. If another Republican can hold the base, continue to grow support with Latino and Black voters, and bring back some of the moderate Republicans that voted for Joe Biden and a bunch of Republicans down ballot, we could be in real trouble.
Bote McBoteface wrote:I’m more worried that their next moron celebrity man crush turned awful president is kid rock.
WrigleyField 22 wrote:Bote McBoteface wrote:I’m more worried that their next moron celebrity man crush turned awful president is kid rock.
I'm thinking more Joe Rogan.
Sammy Sofa wrote:WrigleyField 22 wrote:Bote McBoteface wrote:I’m more worried that their next moron celebrity man crush turned awful president is kid rock.
I'm thinking more Joe Rogan.
Too successful.
NOLA wrote:From Dan Pfeiffer’s message box, which is consistently a great read:There are two ways to look at this past election and spin it forward. One version is that Trump is a uniquely talented populist demagogue with a decades old image as a fabulously successful businessman. Under that scenario, no other Republican is capable of generating the same sky high turnout among white working class voters that lifted both his campaigns. But there is another more concerning version with which Democrats must wrestle. What if Trump is a uniquely weak candidate? In 2016 and 2020, he underperformed other Republicans on the ballot. If another Republican can hold the base, continue to grow support with Latino and Black voters, and bring back some of the moderate Republicans that voted for Joe Biden and a bunch of Republicans down ballot, we could be in real trouble.
I tend to subscribe to the former, that Trump is a unique celebrity injected in our politics. Do we really think Tom Cotton would generate as much enthusiasm? Still, I worry that the gains made with the Hispanic voters are a trend.
Cubfanintheknow wrote:NOLA wrote:From Dan Pfeiffer’s message box, which is consistently a great read:There are two ways to look at this past election and spin it forward. One version is that Trump is a uniquely talented populist demagogue with a decades old image as a fabulously successful businessman. Under that scenario, no other Republican is capable of generating the same sky high turnout among white working class voters that lifted both his campaigns. But there is another more concerning version with which Democrats must wrestle. What if Trump is a uniquely weak candidate? In 2016 and 2020, he underperformed other Republicans on the ballot. If another Republican can hold the base, continue to grow support with Latino and Black voters, and bring back some of the moderate Republicans that voted for Joe Biden and a bunch of Republicans down ballot, we could be in real trouble.
I tend to subscribe to the former, that Trump is a unique celebrity injected in our politics. Do we really think Tom Cotton would generate as much enthusiasm? Still, I worry that the gains made with the Hispanic voters are a trend.
Not if Julian Castro becomes Kamala's running mate.
David wrote:Cubfanintheknow wrote:NOLA wrote:From Dan Pfeiffer’s message box, which is consistently a great read:
I tend to subscribe to the former, that Trump is a unique celebrity injected in our politics. Do we really think Tom Cotton would generate as much enthusiasm? Still, I worry that the gains made with the Hispanic voters are a trend.
Not if Julian Castro becomes Kamala's running mate.
As far as Florida and Miami-Dade go, Julian Castro isn't getting them anywhere with Cubans.
But nobody would make a difference there.
NOLA wrote:From Dan Pfeiffer’s message box, which is consistently a great read:There are two ways to look at this past election and spin it forward. One version is that Trump is a uniquely talented populist demagogue with a decades old image as a fabulously successful businessman. Under that scenario, no other Republican is capable of generating the same sky high turnout among white working class voters that lifted both his campaigns. But there is another more concerning version with which Democrats must wrestle. What if Trump is a uniquely weak candidate? In 2016 and 2020, he underperformed other Republicans on the ballot. If another Republican can hold the base, continue to grow support with Latino and Black voters, and bring back some of the moderate Republicans that voted for Joe Biden and a bunch of Republicans down ballot, we could be in real trouble.
I tend to subscribe to the former, that Trump is a unique celebrity injected in our politics. Do we really think Tom Cotton would generate as much enthusiasm? Still, I worry that the gains made with the Hispanic voters are a trend.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Tryptamine and 8 guests