The History Thread
- OleMissCub
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 38706
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
- x 1563
- x 2140
- minnesotacubsfan
- Superstar
- Posts: 19997
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 2:27 pm
- Location: I CANT BREATHE
- x 3256
- x 1206
Re: The History Thread
Sammy Sofa wrote:It's a wild book; it's more "most of Nazi Germany was on speed" than "Hitler was a meth head."
Have you read it? Was it good?
0 x
- Sammy Sofa
- Licks Butts
- Posts: 85180
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
- Location: Washington DC
- x 16307
- x 18509
Re: The History Thread
minnesotacubsfan wrote:Sammy Sofa wrote:It's a wild book; it's more "most of Nazi Germany was on speed" than "Hitler was a meth head."
Have you read it? Was it good?
Yeah, it's a quick fun read (as "fun" as any book about Nazi Germany can be, I guess). It's written in a very "pop" science/history way, which might be due in part to it being translated into english. I wouldn't necessarily place too much stock into it being real solid history, but it's a good read.
1 x
- OleMissCub
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 38706
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
- x 1563
- x 2140
- OleMissCub
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 38706
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
- x 1563
- x 2140
- Banedon
- Curse You!
- Posts: 68838
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
- Location: Kidding Myself
- x 7293
- x 7192
Re: The History Thread
OleMissCub wrote:Props to that guy for having more composure than the Hindenburg reporter
True, but the Hindenburg one is the one you remember.
0 x
- jersey cubs fan
- Inner-Circle HOF
- Posts: 62668
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:38 pm
- Location: Hoboken squat cobbler
- x 3540
- x 12648
Re: The History Thread
Banedon wrote:OleMissCub wrote:Props to that guy for having more composure than the Hindenburg reporter
True, but the Hindenburg one is the one you remember.
He was three hours in. I’d like to hear his immediate reaction
0 x
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.
- Tim
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 46169
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 5:02 pm
- Location: Naperville, IL
- x 89
- x 3003
- Contact:
Re: The History Thread
jersey cubs fan wrote:Banedon wrote:OleMissCub wrote:Props to that guy for having more composure than the Hindenburg reporter
True, but the Hindenburg one is the one you remember.
He was three hours in. I’d like to hear his immediate reaction
Before or after he changed his pants?
0 x
- Sammy Sofa
- Licks Butts
- Posts: 85180
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
- Location: Washington DC
- x 16307
- x 18509
Re: The History Thread
OleMissCub wrote:Props to that guy for having more composure than the Hindenburg reporter
Now THAT'S holding a horsefeathering grudge.
0 x
- minnesotacubsfan
- Superstar
- Posts: 19997
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 2:27 pm
- Location: I CANT BREATHE
- x 3256
- x 1206
Re: The History Thread
OleMissCub wrote:You can text that number and it’ll tell you whose native land you are on
I cheated, Suquamish is where Chief Seattle is buried and still tribal land. But it is only a few miles from my place

As is this famous log actually;

2 x
-
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 24149
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:52 pm
- Location: Pike Road, Al
- x 537
- x 1124
Re: The History Thread
Chris Hays had a tweet today of the 5 worst Presidents. I'm going with
1. Trump
2. Johnson
3. Buchanan
4. Harding
5. W
Dishonorable mention: Jackson, Nixon, Pierce, Hoover, Wilson (no order)
1. Trump
2. Johnson
3. Buchanan
4. Harding
5. W
Dishonorable mention: Jackson, Nixon, Pierce, Hoover, Wilson (no order)
0 x
- Derwood
- Stall Monitor
- Posts: 73593
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: 375 Miles East of Wrigley
- x 1578
- x 3431
Re: The History Thread
CubinNY wrote:Chris Hays had a tweet today of the 5 worst Presidents. I'm going with
1. Trump
2. Johnson
3. Buchanan
4. Harding
5. W
Dishonorable mention: Jackson, Nixon, Pierce, Hoover, Wilson (no order)
Andrew Jackson orchestrated actual genocide. I don't know how he's out of the top 5
3 x
- OleMissCub
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 38706
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
- x 1563
- x 2140
Re: The History Thread
CubinNY wrote:Chris Hays had a tweet today of the 5 worst Presidents. I'm going with
1. Trump
2. Johnson
3. Buchanan
4. Harding
5. W
Dishonorable mention: Jackson, Nixon, Pierce, Hoover, Wilson (no order)
Too soon to rank him higher than Buchanan at this point.
Nixon is a weird one. You’ll sometimes see him ranked as high as the teens and sometimes in the 30’s. Really depends on how much weight is put on the “he undermined the public’s faith in the office” argument.
0 x
- JudasIscariotTheBird
- 5-Time All-Star
- Posts: 6932
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:05 am
- Location: Denver, CO
- x 7019
- x 3087
Re: The History Thread
OleMissCub wrote:
Too soon

1 x
"None of these signal alarm bells to me"-Boris
"Sublime was driven by their frontman, who was, quite probably, a musical savant." -RIP Stannis
(Formerly Diceman4221)
"Sublime was driven by their frontman, who was, quite probably, a musical savant." -RIP Stannis
(Formerly Diceman4221)
Re: The History Thread
Derwood wrote:CubinNY wrote:Chris Hays had a tweet today of the 5 worst Presidents. I'm going with
1. Trump
2. Johnson
3. Buchanan
4. Harding
5. W
Dishonorable mention: Jackson, Nixon, Pierce, Hoover, Wilson (no order)
Andrew Jackson orchestrated actual genocide. I don't know how he's out of the top 5
Until somewhat recently, he actually tended to rank highly in historians views.
And the simple truth of the matter is that the Presidency is an incredibly difficult position. Even the good Presidents are judged (deservingly) harshly on their mistakes. FDR interned Japanese-Americans, Jefferson was a slave-rapist who nearly destroyed the legitimacy of the Supreme Court, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation only freed Southern slaves not Northern ones, Wilson was super-racist and ignored the 1st Amendment, etc...
The average President seems to get more things wrong than right. The good ones simply minimize their damage.
0 x
- OleMissCub
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 38706
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
- x 1563
- x 2140
Re: The History Thread
Rob wrote:Derwood wrote:CubinNY wrote:Chris Hays had a tweet today of the 5 worst Presidents. I'm going with
1. Trump
2. Johnson
3. Buchanan
4. Harding
5. W
Dishonorable mention: Jackson, Nixon, Pierce, Hoover, Wilson (no order)
Andrew Jackson orchestrated actual genocide. I don't know how he's out of the top 5
Until somewhat recently, he actually tended to rank highly in historians views.
And the simple truth of the matter is that the Presidency is an incredibly difficult position. Even the good Presidents are judged (deservingly) harshly on their mistakes. FDR interned Japanese-Americans, Jefferson was a slave-rapist who nearly destroyed the legitimacy of the Supreme Court, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation only freed Southern slaves not Northern ones, Wilson was super-racist and ignored the 1st Amendment, etc...
The average President seems to get more things wrong than right. The good ones simply minimize their damage.
Great post.
There are some who are unilaterally terrible though, and I’m certain Trump will forever have a place alongside Buchanan and Harding.
1 x
- OleMissCub
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 38706
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
- x 1563
- x 2140
Re: The History Thread
JudasIscariotTheBird wrote:OleMissCub wrote:
Too soon
Well he hasn’t YET caused a war that killed the modern equivalent of 7.5 million Americans. Perhaps he still may.
0 x
Re: The History Thread
CubinNY wrote:Chris Hays had a tweet today of the 5 worst Presidents. I'm going with
1. Trump
2. Johnson
3. Buchanan
4. Harding
5. W
Dishonorable mention: Jackson, Nixon, Pierce, Hoover, Wilson (no order)
Trump has made W not look so bad by comparison. He was the true useful idiot because he could be controlled by the evils of the GOP.
0 x
- JudasIscariotTheBird
- 5-Time All-Star
- Posts: 6932
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:05 am
- Location: Denver, CO
- x 7019
- x 3087
Re: The History Thread
OleMissCub wrote:JudasIscariotTheBird wrote:OleMissCub wrote:
Too soon
Well he hasn’t YET caused a war that killed the modern equivalent of 7.5 million Americans. Perhaps he still may.
Buchanan totally sucked, but the Civil War isn't all on him. It very well might have had to have been fought. The fact that he didn't lift a finger to stop it is abborent, but he just happened to be around before the Civil War. I think Trump is clearly worse, circumstance and abilities and intentions considered. But too soon to judge Trump!? Come on! What are you waiting for?
0 x
"None of these signal alarm bells to me"-Boris
"Sublime was driven by their frontman, who was, quite probably, a musical savant." -RIP Stannis
(Formerly Diceman4221)
"Sublime was driven by their frontman, who was, quite probably, a musical savant." -RIP Stannis
(Formerly Diceman4221)
Re: The History Thread
OleMissCub wrote:
Great post.
There are some who are unilaterally terrible though, and I’m certain Trump will forever have a place alongside Buchanan and Harding.
Undoubtedly. You can make arguments that a handful of Presidents were worse. But he will forever rank in the bottom tier of American presidents.
0 x
- OleMissCub
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 38706
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
- x 1563
- x 2140
Re: The History Thread
JudasIscariotTheBird wrote:OleMissCub wrote:JudasIscariotTheBird wrote:
Well he hasn’t YET caused a war that killed the modern equivalent of 7.5 million Americans. Perhaps he still may.
Buchanan totally sucked, but the Civil War isn't all on him. It very well might have had to have been fought. The fact that he didn't lift a finger to stop it is abborent, but he just happened to be around before the Civil War. I think Trump is clearly worse, circumstance and abilities and intentions considered. But too soon to judge Trump!? Come on! What are you waiting for?
Too soon to jump him worse than Buchanan is all I said.
Although yeah, you’re probably right. His intentions were never good and his abilities were never there. I think Buchanan was just horridly incompetent and weak, not evil.
0 x
- seanimal
- stats enthousiast
- Posts: 9330
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:56 am
- Location: the final frontier
- x 457
- x 547
Re: The History Thread
i think to some extent that andrew jackson's ability to escape popular historical scrutiny for a long time has to do with who was doing the history. Jackson, through his various exploits obtained a reputation of unabashed ruthlessness, which endeared itself to generations of academic men who largely viewed history as a collection of Great Men. As soon as more critical voices entered the conversation, Jackson's star began to dim. We have no greater evidence of this lack of scrutiny than to observe that his image is featured prominently on a note issued by the us treasury.
2 x
- seanimal
- stats enthousiast
- Posts: 9330
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:56 am
- Location: the final frontier
- x 457
- x 547
Re: The History Thread
i understand there's going to be some recency bias but i just don't see how trump is not the worst president ever. by no measure was he successful at anything; no significant legislative accomplishments, no lasting policy positions, two impeachments, a single term ending in violent shame. All of the "conservative wins", i.e. judges, are owned by McConnell. Not sure how getting ridden like a stolen mule by mitch could be considered an accomplishment in any way, shape, or form.
2 x
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Irrelevant Dude and 4 guests