Star Trek thread

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 80808
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 12162
x 14759

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Sammy Sofa » Mon Jan 22, 2018 9:49 pm

OleMissCub wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:It's OK; it is indeed a love letter to a show that was mediocre (or worse) more often than not. It's a pleasant enough watch, but I can't see how it could possibly actually start pulling off good to great TNG unless it does a pretty dramatic about face (and ditches MacFarlane; bottom line, the guy's range is WAY too limited for the role he's given himself).


Well you know that won’t happen since it’s essentially his Star Trek fan fiction


Right, so I don't see it having a ceiling higher than the TV equivalent of a pleasant bowl of soup. I think the hype it gets as time as being "real ST" is hinged mostly on how much it reminds people of the nostalgia they have for middling episodes of TNG, which is ultimately a pretty low bar to hurdle. It's fine! But I don't see, unfortunately, how it can really become much more than what it is right now.

I also think it's overstated by some fans how "real ST" is something less intense than Discovery (which I also think is just OK); TNG didn't become any good until Roddenberry stepped back and they were able to ditch his "in the future nobody has any conflict" BS. DS9 went from being a totally forgettable spinoff to great sci-fi series once they embraced depicting what a war in that universe would be like. Discovery's problems aren't, IMO, that it's "too dark" so much as it just hasn't found its footing yet with the characters and the stories they want to tell, and, especially, that they needlessly shoehorned in as a prequel.
0 x

User avatar
OleMissCub
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37427
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
x 1229
x 1571

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby OleMissCub » Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:43 pm

Sammy Sofa wrote:
OleMissCub wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:It's OK; it is indeed a love letter to a show that was mediocre (or worse) more often than not. It's a pleasant enough watch, but I can't see how it could possibly actually start pulling off good to great TNG unless it does a pretty dramatic about face (and ditches MacFarlane; bottom line, the guy's range is WAY too limited for the role he's given himself).


Well you know that won’t happen since it’s essentially his Star Trek fan fiction


Right, so I don't see it having a ceiling higher than the TV equivalent of a pleasant bowl of soup. I think the hype it gets as time as being "real ST" is hinged mostly on how much it reminds people of the nostalgia they have for middling episodes of TNG, which is ultimately a pretty low bar to hurdle. It's fine! But I don't see, unfortunately, how it can really become much more than what it is right now.

I also think it's overstated by some fans how "real ST" is something less intense than Discovery (which I also think is just OK); TNG didn't become any good until Roddenberry stepped back and they were able to ditch his "in the future nobody has any conflict" BS. DS9 went from being a totally forgettable spinoff to great sci-fi series once they embraced depicting what a war in that universe would be like. Discovery's problems aren't, IMO, that it's "too dark" so much as it just hasn't found its footing yet with the characters and the stories they want to tell, and, especially, that they needlessly shoehorned in as a prequel.


Discovery has potential, certainly. As you said, every Trek show requires time to find it's footing. DS9 certainly found it's better than any other show. The last few seasons of DS9 are the best of Trek TV, in my opinion.

Ironically, what many people consider the worst Trek TV, Enterprise, might have the best single season of any Trek show. The final season of ENT just absolutely slays. It's total fan service, but the show finally gave what most people were wanting in a, ya know, prequel. In the span of a single season they show were Khan and his augments came from, Data's origins, they fix the canon inconsistency with the Klingons, they show Vulcans becoming truly emotionless robots, and they show the creation of the Federation. Plus the "In a Mirror, Darkly" mirror universe episode ranks among the all-time great Trek episodes. One just has to make sure not to watch that final episode...ever.

As you alluded to, Discovery has no reason to be a prequel. The final season of ENT answered most of the questions and cleaned up the canon inconsistencies. Discovery would be better served by being 50 years past Voyager or whatever. Having it be 10 years before TOS is just goofy and unnecessary.
0 x

User avatar
OleMissCub
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37427
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
x 1229
x 1571

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby OleMissCub » Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:17 am

I'm gonna dork out. My dream crew:

Captain - Picard
1st Officer - Spock
Security - Odo
Science - Data
Helmsman - Paris
Engineer - Trip
Doctor - The Doctor
0 x

User avatar
javy knows my name
previously Beertown Cubbie
Posts: 9166
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Chicago
x 1496
x 628

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby javy knows my name » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:22 pm

Sammy Sofa wrote:
OleMissCub wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:It's OK; it is indeed a love letter to a show that was mediocre (or worse) more often than not. It's a pleasant enough watch, but I can't see how it could possibly actually start pulling off good to great TNG unless it does a pretty dramatic about face (and ditches MacFarlane; bottom line, the guy's range is WAY too limited for the role he's given himself).


Well you know that won’t happen since it’s essentially his Star Trek fan fiction


Right, so I don't see it having a ceiling higher than the TV equivalent of a pleasant bowl of soup.


This is delightfully weird
1 x
neely wrote:but in reality
2006 .364
2007 .351
2008 his one big year
2009 .347
2010 90 games played
2011 .323
what do you call that?

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 80808
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 12162
x 14759

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Sammy Sofa » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:25 pm

I really should get paid for this stuff.
0 x

User avatar
OleMissCub
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37427
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
x 1229
x 1571

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby OleMissCub » Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:13 pm

javy knows my name wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:
OleMissCub wrote:
Well you know that won’t happen since it’s essentially his Star Trek fan fiction


Right, so I don't see it having a ceiling higher than the TV equivalent of a pleasant bowl of soup.


This is delightfully weird


It’s an accurate statement indeed. Sometimes a hot bowl of tomato soup with some crackers is all I need to satisfy me. The Orville is the epitome of satisfying. I have a very similar feeling toward that time travel show Timeless.
0 x

User avatar
Banedon
Curse You!
Posts: 67164
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
Location: Kidding Myself
x 5818
x 5650

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Banedon » Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:06 pm

Sooooo....there might be 5 new Star Trek TV projects in the works, including one with Patrick Stewart coming back as Picard???

https://io9.gizmodo.com/report-a-next-g ... 1826956945
0 x

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 34301
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 2:42 pm
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
x 1945
x 2018

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:17 pm

Banedon wrote:Sooooo....there might be 5 new Star Trek TV projects in the works


Image

, including one with Patrick Stewart coming back as Picard???


Image
3 x

User avatar
Banedon
Curse You!
Posts: 67164
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
Location: Kidding Myself
x 5818
x 5650

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Banedon » Thu Oct 25, 2018 4:14 pm

The expansion of CBS All Access’ Star Trek universe continues with a two-season order to Star Trek: Lower Decks, a half-hour adult animated comedy series from Rick and Morty head writer and executive producer Mike McMahan, a long-time Star Trek fan. Star Trek: Lower Decks, which will focus on the support crew serving on one of Starfleet’s least important ships, marks CBS All Access’ first original animated series and the first project to be produced by CBS Eye Animation Productions, a newly launched animation arm of CBS Television Studios.


https://deadline.com/2018/10/star-trek- ... 202489207/
0 x

User avatar
Banedon
Curse You!
Posts: 67164
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
Location: Kidding Myself
x 5818
x 5650

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Banedon » Wed Dec 05, 2018 12:46 pm

Per The Wrap, Nevins told reporters today that Star Trek: Discovery will be back as expected at the start of the year, while “Picard will start at the end of the year.”
0 x

User avatar
Banedon
Curse You!
Posts: 67164
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
Location: Kidding Myself
x 5818
x 5650

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Banedon » Thu May 16, 2019 1:28 pm

Image

Will be on CBS All Access.
0 x

User avatar
Banedon
Curse You!
Posts: 67164
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
Location: Kidding Myself
x 5818
x 5650

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Banedon » Thu May 23, 2019 5:18 pm

1 x

User avatar
OleMissCub
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37427
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
x 1229
x 1571

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby OleMissCub » Thu May 23, 2019 5:34 pm

Can’t be worse than Discovery.
0 x

User avatar
Banedon
Curse You!
Posts: 67164
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
Location: Kidding Myself
x 5818
x 5650

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Banedon » Thu May 23, 2019 5:36 pm

OleMissCub wrote:Can’t be worse than Discovery.


I absolutely love Discovery. How much of it have you watched?
0 x

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 80808
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 12162
x 14759

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Sammy Sofa » Thu May 23, 2019 5:40 pm

I would kill to see the reaction if this had actually turned out to be a quiet, slice of life story about someone's Autumn years that happened to be set in the 24th century.
0 x

User avatar
OleMissCub
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37427
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
x 1229
x 1571

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby OleMissCub » Thu May 23, 2019 5:54 pm

Banedon wrote:
OleMissCub wrote:Can’t be worse than Discovery.


I absolutely love Discovery. How much of it have you watched?


Through the first season. It was a slog to get through and I'm an enormous Star Trek nerd. Michael just bugs the hell out of me. I like that actress in other roles, but I can't connect to her or care for her character in Discovery.

Is second season better than the first?
0 x

User avatar
Banedon
Curse You!
Posts: 67164
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
Location: Kidding Myself
x 5818
x 5650

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Banedon » Thu May 23, 2019 5:59 pm

OleMissCub wrote:
Banedon wrote:
OleMissCub wrote:Can’t be worse than Discovery.


I absolutely love Discovery. How much of it have you watched?


Through the first season. It was a slog to get through and I'm an enormous Star Trek nerd. Michael just bugs the hell out of me. I like that actress in other roles, but I can't connect to her or care for her character in Discovery.

Is second season better than the first?


I liked the first, but season 2 is where I really got hooked...I think it was much better. Give it a shot. Also there are 4 "short treks" episodes that are worth watching. One in particular informs some important parts of season 2.

The addition of Anson Mount for Season 2 makes a huge difference, and I'd love to see a spinoff with him.
0 x

User avatar
OleMissCub
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37427
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
x 1229
x 1571

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby OleMissCub » Thu May 23, 2019 6:30 pm

Banedon wrote:
OleMissCub wrote:
Banedon wrote:
I absolutely love Discovery. How much of it have you watched?


Through the first season. It was a slog to get through and I'm an enormous Star Trek nerd. Michael just bugs the hell out of me. I like that actress in other roles, but I can't connect to her or care for her character in Discovery.

Is second season better than the first?


I liked the first, but season 2 is where I really got hooked...I think it was much better. Give it a shot. Also there are 4 "short treks" episodes that are worth watching. One in particular informs some important parts of season 2.

The addition of Anson Mount for Season 2 makes a huge difference, and I'd love to see a spinoff with him.


Say whaaaaaat? Cullen Bohannon is in a Star Trek show?? I’ll watch second season for sure. That’s awesome. Will report back.
1 x

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 80808
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 12162
x 14759

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Sammy Sofa » Tue May 28, 2019 1:02 am

1 x

User avatar
OleMissCub
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37427
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:32 am
x 1229
x 1571

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby OleMissCub » Tue May 28, 2019 2:20 am

Amazing. That was flawless.
0 x

Named After Maddux
Role Player
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:03 am
x 33
x 30

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Named After Maddux » Tue May 28, 2019 3:39 am

3 x

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 80808
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 12162
x 14759

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Sammy Sofa » Thu Jun 13, 2019 8:14 pm

2 x

User avatar
jersey cubs fan
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 60373
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Hoboken squat cobbler
x 2853
x 9929

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby jersey cubs fan » Thu Jun 13, 2019 8:28 pm

what's with the third degree, beardo?
2 x
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.

User avatar
The Logan
Superstar
Posts: 15225
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:03 am
Location: Lakeview
x 5617
x 1875

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby The Logan » Thu Jun 13, 2019 8:35 pm

Sammy Sofa wrote:


1 x
Image

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 80808
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 12162
x 14759

Re: Star Trek thread

Postby Sammy Sofa » Thu Jun 13, 2019 8:52 pm

Gotta have the full Frakes (awwwwww yeah):

1 x


Return to “Social”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests