Potential Kris Bryant trade thread
- Banedon
- Curse You!
- Posts: 68700
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
- Location: Kidding Myself
- x 7100
- x 6996
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.
The Logan wrote:horsefeathers it. Trade him. They're obviously not going to spend to make the changes they need to win and they don't have enough bargaining power in Contreras or Schwarber to bring back notable players to make those changes a reality. horsefeathers it. They're gonna do it, might as well accept it.
David wrote:The Logan wrote:horsefeathers it. Trade him. They're obviously not going to spend to make the changes they need to win and they don't have enough bargaining power in Contreras or Schwarber to bring back notable players to make those changes a reality. horsefeathers it. They're gonna do it, might as well accept it.
they don't really need to make major changes to win
David wrote:The Logan wrote:horsefeathers it. Trade him. They're obviously not going to spend to make the changes they need to win and they don't have enough bargaining power in Contreras or Schwarber to bring back notable players to make those changes a reality. horsefeathers it. They're gonna do it, might as well accept it.
they don't really need to make major changes to win
The Logan wrote:David wrote:The Logan wrote:horsefeathers it. Trade him. They're obviously not going to spend to make the changes they need to win and they don't have enough bargaining power in Contreras or Schwarber to bring back notable players to make those changes a reality. horsefeathers it. They're gonna do it, might as well accept it.
they don't really need to make major changes to win
You're right, but part of that hinges on Kris Bryant being your third baseman, does it not?
Ding Dong Johnson wrote:David wrote:The Logan wrote:horsefeathers it. Trade him. They're obviously not going to spend to make the changes they need to win and they don't have enough bargaining power in Contreras or Schwarber to bring back notable players to make those changes a reality. horsefeathers it. They're gonna do it, might as well accept it.
they don't really need to make major changes to win
We've been saying that for 3 years.
Ding Dong Johnson wrote:David wrote:The Logan wrote:horsefeathers it. Trade him. They're obviously not going to spend to make the changes they need to win and they don't have enough bargaining power in Contreras or Schwarber to bring back notable players to make those changes a reality. horsefeathers it. They're gonna do it, might as well accept it.
they don't really need to make major changes to win
We've been saying that for 3 years.
Cubswin11 wrote:Ding Dong Johnson wrote:David wrote:
they don't really need to make major changes to win
We've been saying that for 3 years.
92 wins (NLCS), 95 wins (most in NL in regular season) and last years horsefeathers show the last 3 years. If you think the true talent is closer to 2017 and 18 (I do) than 2019, Pythag agreed, then yeah we don’t need major changes to win. Small tweaks to optimize things are going to put them in a plenty good spot to win 90+ and what more can you really ask for?
David wrote:The Logan wrote:David wrote:
they don't really need to make major changes to win
You're right, but part of that hinges on Kris Bryant being your third baseman, does it not?
yes, it does. that is why they should not trade him.
The Logan wrote:horsefeathers it. Trade him. They're obviously not going to spend to make the changes they need to win and they don't have enough bargaining power in Contreras or Schwarber to bring back notable players to make those changes a reality. horsefeathers it. They're gonna do it, might as well accept it.
Thed Hoyerstein wrote:feel like Trea Turner would make a lot of sense for the Cubs - excellent contact, speed, and creates a dynamic up the middle defense with him and Javy.
Cubswin11 wrote:Ding Dong Johnson wrote:David wrote:
they don't really need to make major changes to win
We've been saying that for 3 years.
92 wins (NLCS), 95 wins (most in NL in regular season) and last years horsefeathers show the last 3 years. If you think the true talent is closer to 2017 and 18 (I do) than 2019, Pythag agreed, then yeah we don’t need major changes to win. Small tweaks to optimize things are going to put them in a plenty good spot to win 90+ and what more can you really ask for?
Derwood wrote:This thread should be dropped a-hole
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.
UMFan83 wrote:Cubswin11 wrote:Ding Dong Johnson wrote:We've been saying that for 3 years.
92 wins (NLCS), 95 wins (most in NL in regular season) and last years horsefeathers show the last 3 years. If you think the true talent is closer to 2017 and 18 (I do) than 2019, Pythag agreed, then yeah we don’t need major changes to win. Small tweaks to optimize things are going to put them in a plenty good spot to win 90+ and what more can you really ask for?
True but they are claiming that they don't have any money to spend and are already down a starter, 2B, utility guy and several bullpen arms. We have to somehow fill those holes while dropping payroll.
Not saying that trading Kris Bryant is my first choice or second or 5th, and horsefeathers the Ricketts for makin them drop payroll, but I think minor tweaks will have us worse than before.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests