The version of the board software has been updated. If you want to use a different theme (currently only subsilver is available), please do the following:

1) click your name in the upper right
2) click user control panel
3) go to the board preferences tab
4) Change from prosilver to subsilver
5) click submit.

Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37979
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby David » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:56 pm

MLB Trade Rumors ‏@mlbtraderumors
Royals Acquire Ervin Santana http://bit.ly/Y26iyd #mlb
Image

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 29783
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:59 pm

lol @ Royals.

User avatar
Cubswin11
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 9067
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:17 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Cubswin11 » Wed Oct 31, 2012 3:00 pm

Johnathan Sanchez 2.0
Screw Pitchers

davell
Superstar
Posts: 14223
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:55 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby davell » Wed Oct 31, 2012 3:09 pm

Well, if Santana is tradable, Haren's getting dealt for sure.

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37979
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby David » Wed Oct 31, 2012 3:14 pm

Jon Morosi ‏@jonmorosi
Sources: #Angels receive Brandon Sisk in Ervin Santana trade.
Expand
Image

davell
Superstar
Posts: 14223
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:55 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby davell » Wed Oct 31, 2012 3:21 pm

Angels are paying some money in the deal. No clue why they didn't just release him, since Sisk is basically a nothing return.

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37979
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby David » Wed Oct 31, 2012 3:21 pm

davell wrote:Angels are paying some money in the deal. No clue why they didn't just release him, since Sisk is basically a nothing return.


Was there a buyout amount?
Image

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 29783
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Wed Oct 31, 2012 3:25 pm

David wrote:
davell wrote:Angels are paying some money in the deal. No clue why they didn't just release him, since Sisk is basically a nothing return.


Was there a buyout amount?


Cot's lists a $1 million buyout.

davell
Superstar
Posts: 14223
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:55 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby davell » Wed Oct 31, 2012 3:52 pm

According to a few on Twitter, Angels likely just kicking in buyout money of a mill. So, the Royals, who came out recently saying they have 20 mill to spend on pitching thisvoffseason, just spent 13 on Santana and probably 3 on Volstad. Before FA can even sign with other teams. Phenomenal.

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37979
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby David » Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:01 pm

Mike DiGiovanna ‏@MikeDiGiovanna
According to industry source, #Angels are sending $1 million to #Royals as part of Ervin Santana trade.

soooo.... the buyout amount
Image

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 29783
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:03 pm

Fangraphs lists Santana as literally the worst starting pitcher in baseball last year. Although some guys had a worse rate but didn't get as many starts.

User avatar
AlwaysaCub
All-Star
Posts: 1084
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 9:24 pm
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby AlwaysaCub » Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:16 pm

Ervin Santana bWAR over past 5 seasons:
4.8
-0.3
2.5
2.7
-1.6

Yeah he had a terrible 2012, but his track record isn't nearly that bad.

Plus, the $13m salary for 2013 may look much more palatable after this winter. Every team has cash to burn.

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37979
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby David » Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:24 pm

AlwaysaCub wrote:Ervin Santana bWAR over past 5 seasons:
4.8
-0.3
2.5
2.7
-1.6

Yeah he had a terrible 2012, but his track record isn't nearly that bad.

Plus, the $13m salary for 2013 may look much more palatable after this winter. Every team has cash to burn.


fWAR >>>>>> bWAR
Image

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 29783
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:36 pm

Under either WAR calculation, he should be trolling for an NRI this offseason and not getting a guaranteed $12 million extra from the Royals.

Gilby
All-Star
Posts: 1349
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:13 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Gilby » Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:40 pm

This is funny. I can't believe a team was actually willing to do this.

But this is excellent news for the Cubs. I was thinking of Shaun Marcum specifically, a potential Cubs target who is from KC, could pick the Royals over a few teams if the offer is close. That seems unlikely now with the payments to Santana and Volstad.

User avatar
AlwaysaCub
All-Star
Posts: 1084
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 9:24 pm
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby AlwaysaCub » Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:48 pm

David wrote:
AlwaysaCub wrote:Ervin Santana bWAR over past 5 seasons:
4.8
-0.3
2.5
2.7
-1.6

Yeah he had a terrible 2012, but his track record isn't nearly that bad.

Plus, the $13m salary for 2013 may look much more palatable after this winter. Every team has cash to burn.


fWAR >>>>>> bWAR


Okay, his fWAR for past 5 seasons:
5.8
1.0
2.2
2.9
-0.9

Why should this guy be an NRI after 1 bad season? Some team was going to sign him for $7m+ if his option wasn't picked up. The Royals probably expect substantial inflation in salaries this offseason. Plus where else are the Royals going to get pitching? Everyone needs it.

User avatar
Sammy's Boombox
Formerly eb14play2
Posts: 3905
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:52 am
Location: Kansas City, MO
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Sammy's Boombox » Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:11 pm

As I said yesterday Dayton Moore said the Royals are trying to get "2 or 3 starting pitchers." The owner said at the end of the year that he was willing to operate at a loss to go out and get pitching. They will sign one free agent, point to Duffy returning, and point to Volstad and Santana and say that the players underperformed. Sorry, fans. We don't have a crystal ball.
CUBS PACKERS MIZZOU

User avatar
Slide Castro Slide
Formerly West Side Rooter
Posts: 24175
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:41 am
Location: Baseball Hell
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Slide Castro Slide » Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:23 pm

I don't know about anything else, but I'd have happily sent the Angels $1MM+one of our junk relief prospect for Santana.

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37979
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby David » Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:33 pm

Slide Castro Slide wrote:I don't know about anything else, but I'd have happily sent the Angels $1MM+one of our junk relief prospect for Santana.


Why? We could do much better things with $13M.
Image

User avatar
Castro's Spray Chart
previously Beertown Cubbie
Posts: 8027
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: the REAL chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Castro's Spray Chart » Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:59 pm

Slide Castro Slide wrote:I don't know about anything else, but I'd have happily sent the Angels $1MM+one of our junk relief prospect for Santana.


True.
neely wrote:but in reality
2006 .364
2007 .351
2008 his one big year
2009 .347
2010 90 games played
2011 .323
what do you call that?

User avatar
yanrslatr
fka mariners revenge
Posts: 16054
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:04 am
Status: Offline

Re: Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby yanrslatr » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:37 pm

Slide Castro Slide wrote:I don't know about anything else, but I'd have happily sent the Angels $1MM+one of our junk relief prospect for Santana.


Are you making an unrelated point or do you have the direction of the payment reversed?

User avatar
Slide Castro Slide
Formerly West Side Rooter
Posts: 24175
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:41 am
Location: Baseball Hell
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Slide Castro Slide » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:09 pm

Yeah, I thought I read that KC was only sending the Angels $1MM. Didn't realize that Santana's option was that much either. $12MM is a lot for Ervin Santana when you're the Kansas City Royals. I'd still take the one year $15MM risk on Haren though.

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 29783
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:54 pm

AlwaysaCub wrote:Why should this guy be an NRI after 1 bad season?


Because it was a really bad season and most recent performance is still a pretty good indicator of near-future performance.

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 29783
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:56 pm

David wrote:
Slide Castro Slide wrote:I don't know about anything else, but I'd have happily sent the Angels $1MM+one of our junk relief prospect for Santana.


Why? We could do much better things with $13M.


Agreed. But I don't want to hate on the idea too hard because it'd be better than ending the offseason with our two new SPs being like Carlos Villanueva and someone else like that.

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 49699
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:45 pm
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline

Re: Royals Trade for Ervin Santana

Postby Sammy Sofa » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:00 pm

I guess eating a really expensive Kobe Beef burger that's gone bad is technically better than eating the the chewed up Whopper you found in the trashcan.
Spoiler: show
Image


Return to “Transactions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media and 1 guest