The version of the board software has been updated. If you want to use a different theme (currently only subsilver is available), please do the following:

1) click your name in the upper right
2) click user control panel
3) go to the board preferences tab
4) Change from prosilver to subsilver
5) click submit.

Cubs interested in Porcello?

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Hall of Fame
Posts: 47954
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:23 am
Location: Puget Sound
Status: Online

Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Transmogrified Tiger » Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:19 pm

Barely thread worthy, but it might give SSR a rage-stroke, so there's that.

@georgeofman Now that Miggy has won the MVP, will the Tigers deal Rick Porcello to the Cubs? Told there is a little smoke here.

User avatar
rawaction
Hall of Fame
Posts: 31418
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 5:04 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby rawaction » Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:42 pm

Ok, they really aren't trying are they?

USSoccer
Superstar
Posts: 19537
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 9:56 pm
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby USSoccer » Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:43 pm

How does Cabrera have anything to do with Porcello?

"Now that I'm sitting on the couch, Israel and Palestine need to stop launching rockets at each other"
Jay Cutler - "A Cat" - Jay Cutler is a cat.

Image

gocubs2118
Role Player
Posts: 248
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:55 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby gocubs2118 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:51 pm

I don't think Offman has ever broke a story in his life, I'd take this with a pretty big grain of salt.

User avatar
Gilby
All-Star
Posts: 2299
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: Des Moines
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Gilby » Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:53 pm

rawaction wrote:Ok, they really aren't trying are they?


A 23 year old AL pitcher who had good peripherals last season...doesn't sound bad to me

He's also a groundball pitcher and the Cubs' infield defense is a strength.

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 30580
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:58 pm

I'd be at least vaguely curious about Porcello if we didn't already have two fifth starters in the rotation.

User avatar
rawaction
Hall of Fame
Posts: 31418
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 5:04 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby rawaction » Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:56 pm

Gilby wrote:
rawaction wrote:Ok, they really aren't trying are they?


A 23 year old AL pitcher who had good peripherals last season...doesn't sound bad to me

He's also a groundball pitcher and the Cubs' infield defense is a strength.


His peripherals have been the same his whole career. 4.8-5.5 K/9, doesn't walk people, gives up a metric asston of hits. He was only at 1.2 GB/FB ratio last year, which is above his career average. He's a league average pitcher at best unless a huge light comes on for him. He's Travis Wood redux.

User avatar
EhDubya
All-Star
Posts: 1125
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:01 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby EhDubya » Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:56 pm

Now that the Knicks are 5-0, will the Jets fire Rex Ryan? Little birdie told me there's smoke here.

User avatar
KingCubsFan
All-Star
Posts: 3209
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby KingCubsFan » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:12 pm

rawaction wrote:
Gilby wrote:
rawaction wrote:Ok, they really aren't trying are they?


A 23 year old AL pitcher who had good peripherals last season...doesn't sound bad to me

He's also a groundball pitcher and the Cubs' infield defense is a strength.


His peripherals have been the same his whole career. 4.8-5.5 K/9, doesn't walk people, gives up a metric asston of hits. He was only at 1.2 GB/FB ratio last year, which is above his career average. He's a league average pitcher at best unless a huge light comes on for him. He's Travis Wood redux.

Looking at the numbers, he's slowly improving. Plus the fastball velocity jumped up last year. I could see why the Cubs would be interested, but I wonder what it would take to get him, considering he's still young.

davell
Superstar
Posts: 14703
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:55 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby davell » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:19 pm

My honest guess is it'd cost Barney, which would negate some of the positives you'd be acquiring with him.

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 30580
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:19 pm

Actually, the more I look, the more I want.

About to turn 24 years old, league-average starting pitcher, 2.36 GB/FB ratio last year. Put him behind our infield defense and with the slow Wrigley grass and you really might have something.

With him and Baker, you've got a nice start to breaking our impressively awful three-year streak of issuing the most walks in the league.

And best of all, it actually involves filling a spot for several years. Every spot we fill now is one less we have to worry about in 2014 or 2015, so we can stop with the "we need so many people let's just get no one" routine.

User avatar
KingCubsFan
All-Star
Posts: 3209
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby KingCubsFan » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:36 pm

davell wrote:My honest guess is it'd cost Barney, which would negate some of the positives you'd be acquiring with him.

That was my thought as well. I'm not a big fan of Barney long-term, but he seems like the type you'd want to hold onto with the hope that someone will offer something ridiculous at the trading deadline.

User avatar
Slide Castro Slide
Formerly West Side Rooter
Posts: 24958
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:41 am
Location: Baseball Hell
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Slide Castro Slide » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:53 pm

Do I particularly want Rick Porcello? No.
Would I be particularly upset if we acquired Rick Procello without giving up anything of value? No.
Pretty much how I feel about every big league acquisition Theo's made.

User avatar
A New Era
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 6012
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 7:47 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby A New Era » Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:20 am

gocubs2118 wrote:I don't think Offman has ever broke a story in his life, I'd take this with a pretty big grain of salt.


Maybe the smoke was the talking smoke Offman saw when he was toking?
Image

Radar3454
Starter
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 9:49 am
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Radar3454 » Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:15 pm

davell wrote:My honest guess is it'd cost Barney, which would negate some of the positives you'd be acquiring with him.

I would trade Barney for him in a heartbeat

CubinNY
Superstar
Posts: 18914
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:52 am
Location: Pike Road, Al
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby CubinNY » Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:25 pm

Radar3454 wrote:
davell wrote:My honest guess is it'd cost Barney, which would negate some of the positives you'd be acquiring with him.

I would trade Barney for him in a heartbeat

I'm probably higher on Barney than most here, and I'd do it too, easily.

Backtobanks
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:32 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Backtobanks » Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:09 am

Now that the Tigers have signed Hunter, maybe we could swing a deal to get Andy Dirks and Porcello. Offer them Barney + ??????.

User avatar
SouthSideRyan
is ELL
Posts: 46834
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Chicago Loop
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby SouthSideRyan » Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:18 pm

So it doesn't concern any of you that Rick Porcello sucks?
Exile on Waveland wrote: IU smells like poop.

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 41345
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby David » Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:21 pm

SouthSideRyan wrote:So it doesn't concern any of you that Rick Porcello sucks?


No, because he doesn't.
Image

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Hall of Fame
Posts: 47954
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:23 am
Location: Puget Sound
Status: Online

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Transmogrified Tiger » Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:25 pm

There's definitely concern that he won't improve upon what he is now, but he's been league average at worst for 4 straight seasons, he's steadily improved his peripherals for 4 straight years, and he's only 24 for all of next season.

Backtobanks
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:32 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Backtobanks » Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:01 pm

SouthSideRyan wrote:So it doesn't concern any of you that Rick Porcello sucks?


Did you see what the Cubs trotted out to the mound during the 2nd half of the season?

User avatar
rawaction
Hall of Fame
Posts: 31418
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 5:04 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby rawaction » Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:34 pm

I'd take Porcello in a heartbeat if the Cubs didn't already have Travis Wood, Scott Baker, and several other guys who are likely to be very slightly above league average at their very best. I don't really know what I'm expecting, because the Cubs don't have a ton available to give up that wouldn't hurt their rebuilding effort. But when I hear the DBacks possibly giving up on Bauer, when I see the A's with 19 ML ready arms, when hear rumors of Tampa talking about their young arms, I'd like to think the Cubs can do a lot better than Rick Porcello. Hell, I'd rather take a chance that Jurrjens can figure out how to get back to being good, even though he's older, because he actually was somewhat good at one time.

If the Cubs get Porcello, that's probably going to be it for the rotation. Garza, Samardzija, Porcello, Wood, Baker, Vizcaino, and guys like Rusin, Raley, etc. in the upper minors are probably your 2013 Cubs starting rotation in some combination.

Backtobanks
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:32 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby Backtobanks » Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:32 pm

rawaction wrote:I'd take Porcello in a heartbeat if the Cubs didn't already have Travis Wood, Scott Baker, and several other guys who are likely to be very slightly above league average at their very best. I don't really know what I'm expecting, because the Cubs don't have a ton available to give up that wouldn't hurt their rebuilding effort. But when I hear the DBacks possibly giving up on Bauer, when I see the A's with 19 ML ready arms, when hear rumors of Tampa talking about their young arms, I'd like to think the Cubs can do a lot better than Rick Porcello. Hell, I'd rather take a chance that Jurrjens can figure out how to get back to being good, even though he's older, because he actually was somewhat good at one time.

If the Cubs get Porcello, that's probably going to be it for the rotation. Garza, Samardzija, Porcello, Wood, Baker, Vizcaino, and guys like Rusin, Raley, etc. in the upper minors are probably your 2013 Cubs starting rotation in some combination.


I'm most interested in trying to fill the rotation with younger pitchers who could possibly turn it around and fill a need long term rather than the likes of Marcum/Blanton/etc. for a year or two. As you stated, the A's young pitchers, Bauer, Hellickson, Delgado, Jurrjens, Porcello, etc. are better options than middle aged filler. We already know that we're going to suck next year anyhow.

User avatar
rawaction
Hall of Fame
Posts: 31418
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 5:04 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby rawaction » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:48 pm

Backtobanks wrote:
rawaction wrote:I'd take Porcello in a heartbeat if the Cubs didn't already have Travis Wood, Scott Baker, and several other guys who are likely to be very slightly above league average at their very best. I don't really know what I'm expecting, because the Cubs don't have a ton available to give up that wouldn't hurt their rebuilding effort. But when I hear the DBacks possibly giving up on Bauer, when I see the A's with 19 ML ready arms, when hear rumors of Tampa talking about their young arms, I'd like to think the Cubs can do a lot better than Rick Porcello. Hell, I'd rather take a chance that Jurrjens can figure out how to get back to being good, even though he's older, because he actually was somewhat good at one time.

If the Cubs get Porcello, that's probably going to be it for the rotation. Garza, Samardzija, Porcello, Wood, Baker, Vizcaino, and guys like Rusin, Raley, etc. in the upper minors are probably your 2013 Cubs starting rotation in some combination.


I'm most interested in trying to fill the rotation with younger pitchers who could possibly turn it around and fill a need long term rather than the likes of Marcum/Blanton/etc. for a year or two. As you stated, the A's young pitchers, Bauer, Hellickson, Delgado, Jurrjens, Porcello, etc. are better options than middle aged filler. We already know that we're going to suck next year anyhow.


I don't want middle aged filler (still would be OK with signing 1 guy just to be there for the inevitable Garza trade). But young filler isn't much better. I know the 2013 rotation isn't going to be good enough. But I want hope that the 2014 rotation might be. If Porcello is in the 2013 rotation, I know that his spot in the 2014 rotation isn't likely to be any better than average. If a guy like Bauer or Delgado are brought in, the 2013 rotation still won't be good enough, but 2014 gives you some hope with Samardzija, Bauer/Delgado, Vizcaino being possibly set in 3/5 of the rotation. Maybe its too much to ask given the Cubs limited amount of tradeable assets, but it's the only realistic direction I can see working out for the positive.

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 41345
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Cubs interested in Porcello?

Postby David » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:58 pm

rawaction wrote:
Backtobanks wrote:
rawaction wrote:I'd take Porcello in a heartbeat if the Cubs didn't already have Travis Wood, Scott Baker, and several other guys who are likely to be very slightly above league average at their very best. I don't really know what I'm expecting, because the Cubs don't have a ton available to give up that wouldn't hurt their rebuilding effort. But when I hear the DBacks possibly giving up on Bauer, when I see the A's with 19 ML ready arms, when hear rumors of Tampa talking about their young arms, I'd like to think the Cubs can do a lot better than Rick Porcello. Hell, I'd rather take a chance that Jurrjens can figure out how to get back to being good, even though he's older, because he actually was somewhat good at one time.

If the Cubs get Porcello, that's probably going to be it for the rotation. Garza, Samardzija, Porcello, Wood, Baker, Vizcaino, and guys like Rusin, Raley, etc. in the upper minors are probably your 2013 Cubs starting rotation in some combination.


I'm most interested in trying to fill the rotation with younger pitchers who could possibly turn it around and fill a need long term rather than the likes of Marcum/Blanton/etc. for a year or two. As you stated, the A's young pitchers, Bauer, Hellickson, Delgado, Jurrjens, Porcello, etc. are better options than middle aged filler. We already know that we're going to suck next year anyhow.


I don't want middle aged filler (still would be OK with signing 1 guy just to be there for the inevitable Garza trade). But young filler isn't much better. I know the 2013 rotation isn't going to be good enough. But I want hope that the 2014 rotation might be. If Porcello is in the 2013 rotation, I know that his spot in the 2014 rotation isn't likely to be any better than average. If a guy like Bauer or Delgado are brought in, the 2013 rotation still won't be good enough, but 2014 gives you some hope with Samardzija, Bauer/Delgado, Vizcaino being possibly set in 3/5 of the rotation. Maybe its too much to ask given the Cubs limited amount of tradeable assets, but it's the only realistic direction I can see working out for the positive.




Why do you know this?

We allegedly have offers sitting on the table for a few pitchers... McCarthy and Liriano among them.

Samardzija, Garza, McCarthy, 2 of Baker/Liriano/Wood/Vizcaino looks like a rotation that could be anywhere from very good to awesome (if things go right at the back end) to me.
Image


Return to “Transactions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Brian, Cubs 32, squally1313, Tomarken, vance_the_cubs_fan and 10 guests