The version of the board software has been updated. If you want to use a different theme (currently only subsilver is available), please do the following:

1) click your name in the upper right
2) click user control panel
3) go to the board preferences tab
4) Change from prosilver to subsilver
5) click submit.

Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 41328
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby David » Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:31 pm

Figured we could use one of these...especially with the winter meetings coming up.


Marlin Bystro at PSD posted this this morning...

Marlin Bystro wrote:The Cubs could be dark horses on Bourn.


http://forums.prosportsdaily.com/showth ... st24518840


Also, ABTY7 mentioned this...

ABTY7 wrote:Cubs/Yankees spoke (again) yesterday...


http://forums.prosportsdaily.com/showth ... st24519230

I believe there were some Granderson rumors floating around...not sure if that's what it'd be in regard to.
Image

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Hall of Fame
Posts: 47910
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:23 am
Location: Puget Sound
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Transmogrified Tiger » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:09 pm

@BruceMiles2112 #Cubs likely to have a couple of players non-tendered, GM Hoyer says


This surprises me, since the non-tender candidates are:

Shark (nope)
Garza (not unless his arm fell off yesterday)
Russell (nope)
Stewart
Valbuena

I wouldn't think they'd non-tender both the 3B, would they? Especially after the decent season Valbuena put together.

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 18264
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:57 am
Location: The Wastes
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby XZero77 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:15 pm

Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
I wouldn't think they'd non-tender both the 3B, would they? Especially after the decent season Valbuena put together.


Unless they had something in the works for another 3B, I don't see any reason they would, or could afford to, really.

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 30580
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:17 pm

Maybe they've got a line on cheaper deals for both? It's not like Ian Stewart couldn't be re-signed for an NRI if they really wanted him back.

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Hall of Fame
Posts: 47910
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:23 am
Location: Puget Sound
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Transmogrified Tiger » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:19 pm

Stewart I figure is non-tendered regardless of whether he's coming back or not(my guess is not). Valbuena barely made more than the minimum last year, so unless they want to non-tender him in an effort to save 50 grand or something, I'm not sure it's worth the hassle.

User avatar
Cubswin11
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 9707
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:17 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Cubswin11 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:24 pm

Interesting on Bourn, for the right contract I like it. But he doesn't seem like a guy who is gonna age well as him whole game is predicated on his speed.
Screw Pitchers

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 18264
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:57 am
Location: The Wastes
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby XZero77 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:29 pm

Transmogrified Tiger wrote:Stewart I figure is non-tendered regardless of whether he's coming back or not(my guess is not). Valbuena barely made more than the minimum last year, so unless they want to non-tender him in an effort to save 50 grand or something, I'm not sure it's worth the hassle.


I guess I'm thinking either one could get a big league contract from someone.

davell
Superstar
Posts: 14694
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:55 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby davell » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:34 pm

With Garza due to make 10 mill +, I'm hoping we're not flirting with NTing him, because of salary and potential lack of health.

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 30580
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:36 pm

davell wrote:With Garza due to make 10 mill +, I'm hoping we're not flirting with NTing him, because of salary and potential lack of health.


The twisted part of me that is fascinated by terrible things would find that very amusing.

User avatar
jersey cubs fan
Hall of Fame
Posts: 47655
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:38 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby jersey cubs fan » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:58 pm

Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
@BruceMiles2112 #Cubs likely to have a couple of players non-tendered, GM Hoyer says


This surprises me, since the non-tender candidates are:

Shark (nope)
Garza (not unless his arm fell off yesterday)
Russell (nope)
Stewart
Valbuena

I wouldn't think they'd non-tender both the 3B, would they? Especially after the decent season Valbuena put together.


I can't imagine they would miss either or both of those guys if they were unable to resign them on minor league deals.
ARCubsFan wrote:Go Cardinals

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 30580
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:02 pm

Side note: I'd really like to see the media refer to it as "Team X will not tender Player Y a contract" instead of using non-tender as an active verb.

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 41328
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby David » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:06 pm

Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.
Image

User avatar
Tim
Hall of Fame
Posts: 38538
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Naperville, IL
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Tim » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:10 pm

David wrote:Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.

Vote of no confidence for Jackson.

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 30580
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:11 pm

David wrote:Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.


*sproing*

User avatar
Cubswin11
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 9707
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:17 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Cubswin11 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:37 pm

David wrote:Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.

Go out and get Hamilton then
Screw Pitchers

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 41328
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby David » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:38 pm

Cubswin11 wrote:
David wrote:Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.

Go out and get Hamilton then


No, thanks.

Unless the entire market realizes this and he has to take far less than he is expected to get.
Image

User avatar
jersey cubs fan
Hall of Fame
Posts: 47655
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:38 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby jersey cubs fan » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:44 pm

David wrote:
Cubswin11 wrote:
David wrote:Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.

Go out and get Hamilton then


No, thanks.

Unless the entire market realizes this and he has to take far less than he is expected to get.


Sign him up without question.

No brainer for the Cubs in their situation.
ARCubsFan wrote:Go Cardinals

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 18264
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:57 am
Location: The Wastes
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby XZero77 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:47 pm

David wrote:
Cubswin11 wrote:
David wrote:Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.

Go out and get Hamilton then


No, thanks.

Unless the entire market realizes this and he has to take far less than he is expected to get.


Hamilton is a bad fit. I wouldn't feel comfortable going beyond 2-3 years with him, and given where the Cubs are now, that wouldn't make much sense.

That said, Hamilton at a reasonable price for 3 years wouldn't bother me, but someone is going to give him 4-5, imo.

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 18264
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:57 am
Location: The Wastes
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby XZero77 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:48 pm

jersey cubs fan wrote:
David wrote:
Cubswin11 wrote:
David wrote:Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.

Go out and get Hamilton then


No, thanks.

Unless the entire market realizes this and he has to take far less than he is expected to get.


Sign him up without question.

No brainer for the Cubs in their situation.


I agree, giving Hamilton what he's looking for would be a no brain move.

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 41328
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby David » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:49 pm

jersey cubs fan wrote:
David wrote:
Cubswin11 wrote:
David wrote:Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.

Go out and get Hamilton then


No, thanks.

Unless the entire market realizes this and he has to take far less than he is expected to get.


Sign him up without question.

No brainer for the Cubs in their situation.


He is 32 next season and was very bad (given what he's going to command) after May in 2012. His K rate was up significantly last year. In fact,in the last couple months of last year he was up around 35%.

Giving him 100M+ for 5-6 years is a no-brainer all right... in one direction.

Not to mention that whole sorta kinda crazy history he has.
Image

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 18264
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:57 am
Location: The Wastes
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby XZero77 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:56 pm

David wrote:
jersey cubs fan wrote:
David wrote:
Cubswin11 wrote:
David wrote:Jordan Bernfield
‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.

Go out and get Hamilton then


No, thanks.

Unless the entire market realizes this and he has to take far less than he is expected to get.


Sign him up without question.

No brainer for the Cubs in their situation.


He is 32 next season and was very bad (given what he's going to command) after May in 2012. His K rate was up significantly last year. In fact,in the last couple months of last year he was up around 35%.

Giving him 100M+ for 5-6 years is a no-brainer all right... in one direction.

Not to mention that whole sorta kinda crazy history he has.


The biggest red flag is his inability to stay on the field. Add his age to that, and you have a recipe for disaster if you sign him long term.

That substance abuse history is an afterthought.

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Hall of Fame
Posts: 47910
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:23 am
Location: Puget Sound
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Transmogrified Tiger » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:58 pm

jersey cubs fan wrote:
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:I wouldn't think they'd non-tender both the 3B, would they? Especially after the decent season Valbuena put together.


I can't imagine they would miss either or both of those guys if they were unable to resign them on minor league deals.


Valbuena was a league average 3B making < 500k, so I don't think they're getting him on a MiLB deal and there's no cost savings to non-tendering him. It wouldn't be back-breaking to replace him, but considering they don't have anyone who can come close to that right now, I don't see much benefit to not keeping him around for the time being, especially since he can easily slide to a bench role with his ability to play 2B.

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 30580
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:20 pm

Promising to address the bullpen, saying that there's no need to worry about FA OFers blocking prospects. We're back to the part where the front office says all the right things. Optimism rising?

User avatar
jersey cubs fan
Hall of Fame
Posts: 47655
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:38 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby jersey cubs fan » Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:50 pm

I know for the misguided self flagellaters it doesn't make sense to add players who are better than anybody else you could possibly get but in the real world of sane people that is the goal.
ARCubsFan wrote:Go Cardinals

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 18264
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:57 am
Location: The Wastes
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Misc. Cubs offseason rumor discussion

Postby XZero77 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:19 pm

jersey cubs fan wrote:I know for the misguided self flagellaters it doesn't make sense to add players who are better than anybody else you could possibly get but in the real world of sane people that is the goal.


Yeah, we're the misguided ones. Let's just ignore context and sign the best player on the market, regardless of the red flags (of which there are many) surrounding him and the terms he's asking for, simply because he's the best player right now (though wasn't even all that great post-May).

That'd be bright (or reckless, stupid, and otherwise ill-advised).

Even the meatball ex-player "analysts" are advising extreme caution with Hamilton, and that should tell you something. At least with most aging stars you can have some confidence they'll be able to take the field 150 times a year. Hamilton is the very definition of volatile, and the fact that the market for him isn't taking shape under his current demands reflects that. You can make a case that passing on some of the players the FO has passed on was due to being overly cautious, but not in Hamilton's case.

But hey, let's just give him the 5+/100+ he's asking for because we can. [expletive] brilliant.


Return to “Transactions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: PosterToBeNamedLater and 1 guest