The version of the board software has been updated. If you want to use a different theme (currently only subsilver is available), please do the following:

1) click your name in the upper right
2) click user control panel
3) go to the board preferences tab
4) Change from prosilver to subsilver
5) click submit.

Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

User avatar
David
Hall of Fame
Posts: 41389
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline

Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby David » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:47 am

WTF lol

MLB Trade Rumors ‏@mlbtraderumors
Pirates To Sign Francisco Liriano http://bit.ly/XUvsfi #mlb
Image

Tryptamine
All-Star
Posts: 4390
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:13 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Tryptamine » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:07 am

David wrote:WTF lol

MLB Trade Rumors ‏@mlbtraderumors
Pirates To Sign Francisco Liriano http://bit.ly/XUvsfi #mlb


Baker, Villanueva and Feldman deals keep looking better.

User avatar
sneakypower
Javy Baez Fanclub President
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: behind the boathouse
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby sneakypower » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:15 am

i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us
Image

Tryptamine
All-Star
Posts: 4390
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:13 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Tryptamine » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:31 am

Over the last 2 years, 5.23 ERA 4.43 FIP 4.31 xFIP 5.01 BB/9. I'm pretty happy we stayed away from that.

User avatar
UK
Superstar
Posts: 19358
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 8:38 am
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby UK » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:36 am

sneakypower wrote:i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us


I would prefer it over Villanueva but I like the Feldman deal more than the Liriano deal.

Pitt. made a similar signing with Burnett last year and it worked out great for them as far as pitchers with better stuff and getting that finally translate.

I think it was a very good move for the Bucs and one I would've liked to have seen the Cubs do.

User avatar
Irrelevant Dude
All-Star
Posts: 4607
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:40 pm
Location: Stuck in the 80's
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Irrelevant Dude » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:44 am

UK wrote:
sneakypower wrote:i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us


I would prefer it over Villanueva but I like the Feldman deal more than the Liriano deal.

Same here. I don't like Villanueva at all and think Liriano has a higher upside.
Retired User Name: Jody, Jody Davis (2005-2012)

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 18266
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:57 am
Location: The Wastes
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby XZero77 » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:52 am

Irrelevant Dude wrote:
UK wrote:
sneakypower wrote:i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us


I would prefer it over Villanueva but I like the Feldman deal more than the Liriano deal.

Same here. I don't like Villanueva at all and think Liriano has a higher upside.


The difference of course being that Villanueva was apparently willing to accept being a swingman and/or bullpen arm. Unless you like Liriano better than Feldman or Baker, there wasn't a guaranteed rotation slot to offer him.

User avatar
Irrelevant Dude
All-Star
Posts: 4607
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:40 pm
Location: Stuck in the 80's
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Irrelevant Dude » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:01 pm

XZero77 wrote:
Irrelevant Dude wrote:
UK wrote:
sneakypower wrote:i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us


I would prefer it over Villanueva but I like the Feldman deal more than the Liriano deal.

Same here. I don't like Villanueva at all and think Liriano has a higher upside.


The difference of course being that Villanueva was apparently willing to accept being a swingman and/or bullpen arm. Unless you like Liriano better than Feldman or Baker, there wasn't a guaranteed rotation slot to offer him.

That may be true, but Villanueva is a very expensive swingman.
Retired User Name: Jody, Jody Davis (2005-2012)

User avatar
UK
Superstar
Posts: 19358
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 8:38 am
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby UK » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:03 pm

XZero77 wrote:
Irrelevant Dude wrote:
UK wrote:
sneakypower wrote:i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us


I would prefer it over Villanueva but I like the Feldman deal more than the Liriano deal.

Same here. I don't like Villanueva at all and think Liriano has a higher upside.


The difference of course being that Villanueva was apparently willing to accept being a swingman and/or bullpen arm. Unless you like Liriano better than Feldman or Baker, there wasn't a guaranteed rotation slot to offer him.


Villanueva is a swingman guy b/c he can't last 180IP without falling off the map, Baker won't be ready for the start and who knows with Garza.

Even if they did run into a situation later on this Summer with too many starters for rotation spots, a productive Liriano has more trade value than a productive Villanueva.

Tryptamine
All-Star
Posts: 4390
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:13 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Tryptamine » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:12 pm

Irrelevant Dude wrote:
XZero77 wrote:
Irrelevant Dude wrote:
UK wrote:
sneakypower wrote:i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us


I would prefer it over Villanueva but I like the Feldman deal more than the Liriano deal.

Same here. I don't like Villanueva at all and think Liriano has a higher upside.


The difference of course being that Villanueva was apparently willing to accept being a swingman and/or bullpen arm. Unless you like Liriano better than Feldman or Baker, there wasn't a guaranteed rotation slot to offer him.

That may be true, but Villanueva is a very expensive swingman.


He's also going to most likely be getting all the starts after the trade deadline when we presumably move Baker and Feldman.

User avatar
Jake
All-Star
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:21 pm
Location: Living and Breathing that Philadelphia Freedom!
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Jake » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:28 pm

FWIW, the updates are now $13M for 2 years.

I like this. Before this, we had 2 rookies slotted for 4 & 5. Now we only need one of them. His being left handed will play well @ PNC. An overpay to be sure, but that's what we need to do. If he wins 10 games and keeps his ERA under 5, this is a good deal.
Resident Pirate fan of nsbb.com

Image

CubinNY
Superstar
Posts: 18914
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:52 am
Location: Pike Road, Al
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby CubinNY » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:47 pm

sneakypower wrote:i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us

+1

User avatar
illiniguy
Hall of Fame
Posts: 25052
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 7:59 am
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby illiniguy » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:52 pm

Jake when does Cole come into play? Mid season? Next year?
Image

User avatar
weis21
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:45 am
Location: ECU
Status: Offline

Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby weis21 » Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:30 pm

Irrelevant Dude wrote:
XZero77 wrote:
Irrelevant Dude wrote:
UK wrote:
sneakypower wrote:i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us


I would prefer it over Villanueva but I like the Feldman deal more than the Liriano deal.

Same here. I don't like Villanueva at all and think Liriano has a higher upside.


The difference of course being that Villanueva was apparently willing to accept being a swingman and/or bullpen arm. Unless you like Liriano better than Feldman or Baker, there wasn't a guaranteed rotation slot to offer him.

That may be true, but Villanueva is a very expensive swingman.

David Posted a FanGraphs link in the Villanueva thread that stated, given his past results, he would be worth his contract even if used solely in the swingman/relief role.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

User avatar
Hairyducked Idiot
Kyle in disguise
Posts: 30580
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:42 am
Location: Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Hairyducked Idiot » Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:34 pm


User avatar
nilodnayr
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 8263
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 10:41 pm
Location: Chicago
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby nilodnayr » Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:43 pm

UK wrote:
Even if they did run into a situation later on this Summer with too many starters for rotation spots, a productive Liriano has more trade value than a productive Villanueva.


Liriano in the first half of 2011 was exactly what we should expect Liriano to be in the first half of 2012 and the twins got absolute garbage from the Sox for him. Liriano is past the point even were his name has any value.
KING OF THE VWR

"I feel better now, I know I'm not going to die. That's too bad for my family. They thought they were going to be rich without doing anything.'' -Ozzie Guillen

User avatar
Warpticon
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 7713
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 9:16 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Warpticon » Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:48 pm

Man, Fangraphs is awesome.

User avatar
Jake
All-Star
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:21 pm
Location: Living and Breathing that Philadelphia Freedom!
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Jake » Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:53 pm

illiniguy wrote:Jake when does Cole come into play? Mid season? Next year?

Best guess is post all star game. Keep in mind he's had exactly 1 AAA start and it didn't go well at all. Team is doing well and he's doing well, that's my best guess.

I think a lot of it depends on circumstance. If the team is playing like Houston played last year, I don't see him coming up until September. If the team is floundering early and the pitching isn't getting the job done, and he does well his first couple of starts @ Indy, I wouldn't be surprised to see him early May.
Resident Pirate fan of nsbb.com

Image

User avatar
Cubswin11
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 9721
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:17 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby Cubswin11 » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:30 pm

illiniguy wrote:Jake when does Cole come into play? Mid season? Next year?

Depends how well he does in SEAL training this spring
Last edited by Cubswin11 on Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Screw Pitchers

User avatar
UK
Superstar
Posts: 19358
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 8:38 am
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby UK » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:31 pm

nilodnayr wrote:
UK wrote:
Even if they did run into a situation later on this Summer with too many starters for rotation spots, a productive Liriano has more trade value than a productive Villanueva.


Liriano in the first half of 2011 was exactly what we should expect Liriano to be in the first half of 2012 and the twins got absolute garbage from the Sox for him. Liriano is past the point even were his name has any value.


That's b/c Liriano hasn't been able to get his stuff to translate into results, similar to when the Yankees had Burnett and there were wondering if the Cubs and Yanks would unload two bad contracts between Zambrano and Burnett, each had bad deals till the end of those contracts. Burnett went to the NL, improved his control whether he pitched to contact a little more is up for debate but he improved his stock greatly from a year ago. I'd be curious to see what the reaction was when Pitt acquired him.

If Liriano can maintain his stuff and get his ERA to be near his FIP, possibly pitch to cpntact more as well as going from the AL to the NL, I think we will see improvement from him.

I think we'll see Liriano have a much higher WAR than Villanueva during the durations of theses contracts. Also, if he shows any type of consistency or flashes like he had '10, with that cheap contract, he'll have more value than Villanueva.

I would be willing to bet that Liriano has a lower FIP and a higher WAR two years from now.

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 18266
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:57 am
Location: The Wastes
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby XZero77 » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:35 pm

UK wrote:
XZero77 wrote:
Irrelevant Dude wrote:
UK wrote:
sneakypower wrote:i love this deal for them, and i'd have preferred it to the Feldman or Villanueva signings for us


I would prefer it over Villanueva but I like the Feldman deal more than the Liriano deal.

Same here. I don't like Villanueva at all and think Liriano has a higher upside.


The difference of course being that Villanueva was apparently willing to accept being a swingman and/or bullpen arm. Unless you like Liriano better than Feldman or Baker, there wasn't a guaranteed rotation slot to offer him.


Villanueva is a swingman guy b/c he can't last 180IP without falling off the map, Baker won't be ready for the start and who knows with Garza.

Even if they did run into a situation later on this Summer with too many starters for rotation spots, a productive Liriano has more trade value than a productive Villanueva.


I'm not debating that, but do you get him to sign with assurances that he might get starts here or there if guys aren't healthy or get traded? I'm thinking no. Why accept any uncertainty about his role when can just sign with a team with fully open rotations slots?

User avatar
UK
Superstar
Posts: 19358
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 8:38 am
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby UK » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:43 pm

XZero77 wrote:
I'm not debating that, but do you get him to sign with assurances that he might get starts here or there if guys aren't healthy or get traded? I'm thinking no. Why accept any uncertainty about his role when can just sign with a team with fully open rotations slots?


It's worth looking into, we'll never know whether or not the Cubs were interested in Liriano or not but at the time Villanueva was signed, Jackson wasn't signed. They knew they were close with Jackson but the only thing I can see is them valuing Villanueva more b/c of his ability to spot-start and come out of the pen as a better fit than Liriano who has started more.

With that said, the numerous questions about injuries with the rotation and the likely greater production/value Liriano would bring, I would have rather seen them sign him to that contact and worry about roster composition at a later date than possibly settle for a "better" fit.

User avatar
CaliforniaRaisin
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 84518
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 8:20 am
Location: Pasadena, CA
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby CaliforniaRaisin » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:49 pm

Jake wrote:
illiniguy wrote:Jake when does Cole come into play? Mid season? Next year?

Best guess is post all star game. Keep in mind he's had exactly 1 AAA start and it didn't go well at all. Team is doing well and he's doing well, that's my best guess.

I think a lot of it depends on circumstance. If the team is playing like Houston played last year, I don't see him coming up until September. If the team is floundering early and the pitching isn't getting the job done, and he does well his first couple of starts @ Indy, I wouldn't be surprised to see him early May.

Hope they take it slow with him and he's able to iron out his delivery/command.

Also wish he'd be traded to an AL team so I can root for him without fear of him hurting the Cubs.

davell
Superstar
Posts: 14714
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:55 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby davell » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

ABTY had mentioned earlier in the offseason that the Cubs had an offer out to him, same as Feldman's, but Feldman accepted.

User avatar
nilodnayr
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 8263
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 10:41 pm
Location: Chicago
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Pirates sign Liriano 2/14

Postby nilodnayr » Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:17 pm

UK wrote:
nilodnayr wrote:
UK wrote:
Even if they did run into a situation later on this Summer with too many starters for rotation spots, a productive Liriano has more trade value than a productive Villanueva.


Liriano in the first half of 2011 was exactly what we should expect Liriano to be in the first half of 2012 and the twins got absolute garbage from the Sox for him. Liriano is past the point even were his name has any value.


That's b/c Liriano hasn't been able to get his stuff to translate into results, similar to when the Yankees had Burnett and there were wondering if the Cubs and Yanks would unload two bad contracts between Zambrano and Burnett, each had bad deals till the end of those contracts. Burnett went to the NL, improved his control whether he pitched to contact a little more is up for debate but he improved his stock greatly from a year ago. I'd be curious to see what the reaction was when Pitt acquired him.

If Liriano can maintain his stuff and get his ERA to be near his FIP, possibly pitch to cpntact more as well as going from the AL to the NL, I think we will see improvement from him.

I think we'll see Liriano have a much higher WAR than Villanueva during the durations of theses contracts. Also, if he shows any type of consistency or flashes like he had '10, with that cheap contract, he'll have more value than Villanueva.

I would be willing to bet that Liriano has a lower FIP and a higher WAR two years from now.


If Minn and CWS couldn't get him to pitch to contact, no one can. That's just not Liriano. That's like saying if we could just get Bourn to hit 20 hrs, he'd be great! Ohh and Liriano hasn't put up good FIPs.
KING OF THE VWR



"I feel better now, I know I'm not going to die. That's too bad for my family. They thought they were going to be rich without doing anything.'' -Ozzie Guillen


Return to “Transactions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests