Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
And what evidence is there that the new Padres ownership can committ to a higher payroll?

 

What evidence is there they cannot? I don't see why SD can't sign him longterm. Maybe they would rather not and ultimately will not, but there's no reason they can't.

 

Because Moorad bought the team in January of '09 and has shown no signs of being eager to raise payroll?

 

How does this prove they cannot commit to a higher payroll. As I said, they may choose not to, but more likely than not they can. There's been no good reason for them to up their payroll in his first year of ownership, but as the team's biggest draw approaches free agency, perhaps they will see fit.

 

There's no good reason for a new owner coming off of back to back poor seasons along with declining attendance to spend money???

  • Replies 251
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
Guests
Posted

 

I never said small market teams were out of the running for a Holliday type contract. I said that even small market teams can offer up great talent for 1 year of Gonzalez at 6m, so if the Padres make him available, there will be a lot of suitors coming to call, which ups the price. Of course a small market team can afford Holliday at 13m. However, as soon as Oakland was out of the race, they dumped him for whatever they could get in return. Not a bad gamble for Oakland. You are supposed to go into a new season with the intention of winning.

 

A 1 year salary isn't what's damaging to a small-market team, it's long-term commitments that are crippling. That and trading away cost-controlled players. Whether Gonzalez makes 6M or 13M doesn't make a lot of difference when it comes to how much a small-market team is willing to give up.

 

 

 

The Padres can afford a long term deal. I already explained how the Padres payroll was nearly 40m higher than this year only 2 seasons ago. Chris Young will be off the books, which is another 6.25-8.5m, which gives the Padres plenty of room to offer up enough to keep Gonzalez for a very long time. Just like Minnesota did with Mauer.

 

My reference of long term deal was your opinion that not only could small market teams afford Gonzalez next year (because he made 6M), but that they would be looking to extend him once they got him (for presumably 16M+/year) How is that one possible?

 

And what evidence is there that the new Padres ownership can committ to a higher payroll?

 

I completely missed this particular post. I basically make my assumptions based on the fact every team either gives their fanbase the impression or honestly tries to build a winning team each season. Why did Oakland trade for Holliday? Because they knew if they weren't going to be a playoff team, they would know by July and could spin him for money and talent and it wouldn't really cost them all that much. It's not a completely sunk cost to gamble that one or two additions might mean the difference in a pennant or not.

 

If the Padres made Gonzalez available this offseason, a GM (regardless of market size) would be stupid to not attempt to go after someone as talented as Gonzalez considering his contract. And they could just as easily move him at the deadline if it turns out Gonzalez didn't end up being the difference in their season. Rumors float that he could get a Ryan Howard type of contract at the end of this season. If that's the case, that knocks a lot of teams out of the running for him when we talk about extensions, no doubt. But, there is always hope that he loves your town and your fans and that he'd take a lot less to stay if you traded for him. Every GM likes to think that money isn't the entire motivating factor as to where a player signs, even if that is the only motivating factor. They will still try to sweet talk you into staying. If not, trade him at the deadline and try to get back more than he cost you to acquire him.

 

Bottom line, the Padres likely would not get the talent it would require to make it worth it for them to trade him before next season, so it's very unlikely he will be going anywhere prior to the deadline.

Posted
There's no good reason for a new owner coming off of back to back poor seasons along with declining attendance to spend money???

 

Not if he wanted to avoid overpaying mediocre free agents and save that money for when his own guy hit the market.

Posted
And what evidence is there that the new Padres ownership can committ to a higher payroll?

 

What evidence is there they cannot? I don't see why SD can't sign him longterm. Maybe they would rather not and ultimately will not, but there's no reason they can't.

 

I missed this particular question. I just went to ESPN's site and saw that the Padres have a very similar attendance this year to the White Sox at around 25,000 per game. The Sox have a payroll above 100m while the Padres are sitting at about 40m. Not sure how different the median price of a ticket is for Padres and White Sox, but I doubt it's more than double to see a White Sox game. The Padres haven't had a payroll this low or lower since 2001. They have since moved into a new stadium and now charge quite a bit more for tickets than they did in the old park. Over the last 11 years, they are averaging about 53m a year in payroll, which is 15m more than their payroll this year.

 

There is no reason why they can't is exactly the right answer.

 

Average ticket price is almost exactly half that of the White Sox. ($15.15 to $30.28)

 

Strike that, I was working on old White Sox #s. Average White Sox tickets are ~256% that of Padres tickets. Pretty much right in line with their payrolls.

Posted
There's no good reason for a new owner coming off of back to back poor seasons along with declining attendance to spend money???

 

Not if he wanted to avoid overpaying mediocre free agents and save that money for when his own guy hit the market.

 

Probably would've made sense to extend him then.

Guest
Guests
Posted
There's no good reason for a new owner coming off of back to back poor seasons along with declining attendance to spend money???

 

Exactly. He just spent 500m. That's a pretty big hit to the wallet. The team wasn't good and wasn't expected to be good for awhile, so why waste money to possibly turn a 5th place team into a 4th place team. Let the kids play and see what they have. In the meantime, Adrian can still put butts in the seats.

 

Lo and behold, the kids turned out to be better than advertised. Now it is time to think about the future. Sustain the success. Prove to your fanbase you are not Ray Kroc or John Moores. You are the guy who puts a stop to every good player leaving town when it's time to fork out the cash. San Diego is in the top 10 in population. It's not as "small market" as they like to portray themselves. There is probably over 12 million people within 150 miles of Petco Park, not including Mexico. It's a tourist destination that sells a lot of tickets to people who are only here to visit. There is no reason they can't afford to offer up a big ticket contract for one of their own and show the fans they are a new ownership, not the same old.

Posted
Why did Oakland trade for Holliday?

 

Honestly, I have no idea. Well, I should say I have no idea why they traded for him, only to trade him away at the deadline while down 5 games for an underwhelming package centered on Tubby Wallace.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Strike that, I was working on old White Sox #s. Average White Sox tickets are ~256% that of Padres tickets. Pretty much right in line with their payrolls.

 

No kidding? What site are you getting this information from? I'd like to check it out. I would have thought it was actually more for a Padres ticket than a White Sox ticket.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Why did Oakland trade for Holliday?

 

Honestly, I have no idea. Well, I should say I have no idea why they traded for him, only to trade him away at the deadline while down 5 games for an underwhelming package centered on Tubby Wallace.

 

I think everyone was perplexed by that one. But, I sorta hold to the thought process that they felt he was the one missing link to a pennant winning season. When you watch Florida make a couple of subtle moves and win a World Series, I can see why other small market teams might try that recipe. While Pittsburgh hasn't made a splash like Holliday, they've been grabbing up generic free agents and selling them off along with their soon to be expensive talent at the trade deadline to the point it's become rather artful, even if it hasn't produced results. Maybe that's what Oakland was thinking all along. Who knows?

Posted
Strike that, I was working on old White Sox #s. Average White Sox tickets are ~256% that of Padres tickets. Pretty much right in line with their payrolls.

 

No kidding? What site are you getting this information from? I'd like to check it out. I would have thought it was actually more for a Padres ticket than a White Sox ticket.

 

Just searched each one individually. The only stories on mlb ticket prices as a whole usually only list the most expensive and the cheapest, along with increases/decreases % wise

Guest
Guests
Posted

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/blog/big_league_stew/post/Cubs-lead-in-average-ticket-price-delay-for-Wor?urn=mlb-232777

 

Click on the annual MLB survey link in this article for a cool breakdown by team of prices.

 

Interestingly of note is the 45% increase by Minnesota after the Mauer contract increase. San Diego had the biggest decrease, probably thinking about the fallout of Peavy being traded and the team not being good this year. But, the Padres are way down towards the bottom in median price, or so it seems.

 

Looks like I'll have to get a beer if I ever go to a Giants game in San Fran. A 20 oz. beer for 5.75 at the ballpark is a pretty good deal!

Posted

My only concern with not rebuilding is Hendry getting messy with some of the prospects the Cubs have. I would be willing to offer 2 top, 2 mid for Gonzalez not including Castro.

 

What I am hoping for is below:

 

Trade Colvin, Wells, prospect(s) for Adrian Gonzalez

Trade Fukudome, $$, and a prospect for Michael Cuddyer (similar salaries both having down years.)

Let Snyder/LaHair/Hoff work in with Cuddyer, use Cuddyer as a less defensively talented DeRosa to spell Ramirez.

Go for Cliff Lee, but keep eye on Brandon Webb, Tim Hudson or other potential B starters as Lee will most likely go elsewhere.

Go for the cheapest, lowest year option on Frasor, Downs, Arthur Rhodes, Putz or other veteran solid reliever.

Lineup: (Castro, DeWitt, Ramirez, Gonzalez, Soto, Soriano, Byrd, Cuddyer/(hoff, lahair,snyder).

Rotation: Dempster, Zambrano, Hudson/Webb, Gorzelany, Cashner

Bullpen: Marmol, Marshall, FA reliever, Guzman(if healthy), Grabow(puke) fill in the rest.

Guest
Guests
Posted

It will be interesting to see what comes of Brandon Webb if he never pitches this year. Rumor has it that if he does see any time this year, it will be in the bullpen. Nearly 2 seasons removed from the bigs from shoulder surgery and a free agent at the end of this year.

 

Quite a gamble.

Posted

Trade Colvin, Wells, prospect(s) for Adrian Gonzalez

 

Come on now. Us Cubs fans need to stop overvaluing our mid level prospects or above average players as these top players teams are gonna want for their TOP top players. And isn't he a FA soon? Either SD wants him and will extend him, or they don't and if they don't they are gonna sure as hell want Castro + a couple other top guys like Vitters, and Cashner types before they'd answer the phone.

Guest
Guests
Posted
If we spend a dime on Arthur Rhodes, I'm going to be livid.

 

Not as livid as I'll be if we trade Wells for anything less than Evan Longoria.

Posted
As I said earlier, San Diego wouldn't let Hendry finish his sentence once he mentioned the name Castro. Castro is a borderline all-star SS at the age of 20 with (at least) 5 more years of team control.
Posted
In regards to the Padres extending Gonzalez. While the Padres certainly may have the money available to do this, it has been shown to be a bad way to build a team when one player is making 33% or more of their payroll. That may not make the Padres flinch, but it will cripple them for the length of the contract.
Posted
If we spend a dime on Arthur Rhodes, I'm going to be livid.

 

Not as livid as I'll be if we trade Wells for anything less than Evan Longoria.

I get that you like Randy Wells and that we shouldn't discount what he has done, but there are a lot of guys I would be for trading him for.

Posted
If we spend a dime on Arthur Rhodes, I'm going to be livid.

 

Not as livid as I'll be if we trade Wells for anything less than Evan Longoria.

I get that you like Randy Wells and that we shouldn't discount what he has done, but there are a lot of guys I would be for trading him for.

 

Trading from a strength is a good thing. We shouldn't vastly overpay for Gonzalez and I'm not in favor of giving Wells away, but quality starting pitching is an area we are very strong in - both at the major league level and in the minors. We're very weak offensively throughout the organization and, especially, at first base.

 

Gonzalez is an elite player - and, granted, will be looking for elite money, but he fills a massive hole for an extended period of time.

Posted
Fielder wants 8-180 supposedly. I'm sure Gonzalez would be in the same range most likely. So, the question becomes this:(and I'm not sure where I fall on it honestly)Is it worth it, to trade for either of these guys(giving up some very quality pieces) AND resign them to huge deals. Instead of signing Dunn for 4-60 or something like that. And not losing anyone, other than a second round pick in return.
Posted
If we spend a dime on Arthur Rhodes, I'm going to be livid.

 

I feel like a fan of a team 10 years ago said the same thing. That man is going to pitch until he dies.

Posted
Fielder wants 8-180 supposedly. I'm sure Gonzalez would be in the same range most likely. So, the question becomes this:(and I'm not sure where I fall on it honestly)Is it worth it, to trade for either of these guys(giving up some very quality pieces) AND resign them to huge deals. Instead of signing Dunn for 4-60 or something like that. And not losing anyone, other than a second round pick in return.

 

There's a very real chance you'd only get 2-3 good years out of Dunn. If you feel like Gonzalez can be an elite hitter for at least 4 years of the deal, I think you do it. At that point, you can trade him for value or keep him if you feel that he can keep producing.

 

Personally, if he wants 8 years or if the Padres want some silly deal like Wells/Cashner/Vitters/Lee, I might balk and go after Dunn instead. If he's looking at 4-6 years at mega money, however, I think he's worth more than Dunn, even giving up good prospects.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...