Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

CaliforniaRaisin
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 90197
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA
x 538
x 2672

Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby CaliforniaRaisin » Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:56 pm

Box Scores:

Iowa lost 7-4 Box Score

3B D. Bote 1/5, RBI, K, 2 E (throw, fielding)
1B E. Navarro 0/5, RBI, E (1, missed catch)
RF M. Zagunis 2/4, RBI, K
C C. Gimenez 2/4, 2B (2), K
SS R. Court 0/3, 2 K, HBP
SP JH Tseng 5 IP, 7 H, 6 ER, 1 BB, 5 K, 3 HR, 9-3 GO-FO, 96-60 pitches-strikes
RP R. Rosario 2 IP, 3 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 1 K, 1-3 GO-FO
RP S. Simmons 1 IP, 1 H, 1 ER, 1 BB, 1 K, 1-0 GO-FO

Tennessee won 7-2 Box Score

SS Z. Short 1/4, R, 2 RBI, BB, K, SB (1)
LF C. Burks 2/4, R, RBI, BB, 2 K, SB (1)
3B J. Vosler 0/5, 2 K
RF E. Martinez 1/4, R, BB, SB (4)
C I. Rice 1/4, R, 2B (2), BB, K
SP T. Clifton 5 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 5 K, 1 HBP, 5-2 GO-FO, 75-47 pitches-strikes
RP C. Brooks 2 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 0 K, 2-1 GO-FO
RP D. Mekkes 1.1 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 1 K, 1 WP, 1-2 GO-FO

Myrtle Beach lost 3-0 Box Score

CF DJ Wilson 0/3, BB, 2 K
DH PJ Higgins 0/4, 2 K
3B W. Galindo 0/3, K
1B T. Alamo 0/3, 2 K
KF J. Mitchell 1/3, SB (4)
C J. Pereda 0/3
SS A. Monsaterio 0/3, K
SP M. Swarmer 5 IP, 4 H, 1 ER, 1 BB, 8 K, 3-1 GO-FO, 73-52 pitches-strikes

South Bend had the day off
0 x
Image

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 55417
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:23 pm
Location: Greater St. Louis
x 398
x 5518

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby Transmogrified Tiger » Sun Apr 15, 2018 11:11 pm

Rucker went 3 (uninspiring) innings before Tennessee was rained out, so I would guess he’s not gonna go again tomorrow.
0 x

craig
All-Star
Posts: 4165
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 10:52 pm
x 43

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby craig » Sun Apr 15, 2018 11:32 pm

Ademan has K'd over 40% of his AB. Obviously early and small sample, but at this point I wonder if his hitting development might not have been better served with a South Bend assignment. Probably makes no difference, though.
0 x

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 5211
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 287
x 386

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby TomtheBombadil » Mon Apr 16, 2018 12:29 am

craig wrote:Ademan has K'd over 40% of his AB. Obviously early and small sample, but at this point I wonder if his hitting development might not have been better served with a South Bend assignment. Probably makes no difference, though.


He's also got a .167 IsoSLG that was .194 coming into the day. It's proooobably a little soon to hit a panic button.
0 x

davell
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21149
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:55 pm
x 1677
x 2121

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby davell » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:01 am

I'm not worried about K rates with Ademan yet. Nor am I going to take his SLG rates seriously either. But, I do think he's a top 50ish prospect by the end of the year.

And a very nice lead piece to pair with Heyward, to unload his contract, in the offseason.
0 x
Additional rule: you have to have one or the other.The only exception is you have an amazing board name. davell, I'm looking at you; put up a [expletive] avatar or something if your name only sounds like somebody tried say Dave as they lapsed into a coma.

User avatar
Cubswin11
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21058
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:17 pm
x 4463
x 3721

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby Cubswin11 » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:19 am

davell wrote:I'm not worried about K rates with Ademan yet. Nor am I going to take his SLG rates seriously either. But, I do think he's a top 50ish prospect by the end of the year.

And a very nice lead piece to pair with Heyward, to unload his contract, in the offseason.

I’m hoping we don’t need to get rid of anyone prospects to trade a contract this offseason and just can pay Bryce and not worry about money.
0 x
Screw Pitchers

CaliforniaRaisin
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 90197
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA
x 538
x 2672

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby CaliforniaRaisin » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:55 am

Transmogrified Tiger wrote:Rucker went 3 (uninspiring) innings before Tennessee was rained out, so I would guess he’s not gonna go again tomorrow.


Whoops. Fixed.
0 x
Image

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 5211
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 287
x 386

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby TomtheBombadil » Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:02 am

Cubswin11 wrote:
davell wrote:I'm not worried about K rates with Ademan yet. Nor am I going to take his SLG rates seriously either. But, I do think he's a top 50ish prospect by the end of the year.

And a very nice lead piece to pair with Heyward, to unload his contract, in the offseason.

I’m hoping we don’t need to get rid of anyone prospects to trade a contract this offseason and just can pay Bryce and not worry about money.


Has there been any trade where a team included probably their top prospect to move on from a contract?
0 x

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 5211
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 287
x 386

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby TomtheBombadil » Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:05 am

Cubswin11 wrote:
davell wrote:I'm not worried about K rates with Ademan yet. Nor am I going to take his SLG rates seriously either. But, I do think he's a top 50ish prospect by the end of the year.

And a very nice lead piece to pair with Heyward, to unload his contract, in the offseason.

I’m hoping we don’t need to get rid of anyone prospects to trade a contract this offseason and just can pay Bryce and not worry about money.


Has there been any trade where a team included probably their top prospect to move on from a contract? That seems like the opposite of something this FO would do even if some other team has done it before.
Last edited by TomtheBombadil on Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 x

davell
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21149
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:55 pm
x 1677
x 2121

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby davell » Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:15 am

TomtheBombadil wrote:
Cubswin11 wrote:
davell wrote:I'm not worried about K rates with Ademan yet. Nor am I going to take his SLG rates seriously either. But, I do think he's a top 50ish prospect by the end of the year.

And a very nice lead piece to pair with Heyward, to unload his contract, in the offseason.

I’m hoping we don’t need to get rid of anyone prospects to trade a contract this offseason and just can pay Bryce and not worry about money.


Has there been any trade where a team included probably their top prospect to move on from a contract?


Probably not. But I don't remember Arizona's system when they moved Touki with Arroyo.

At any rate, I think they'll do their best to move Heyward, for Bryce. And it's take Ademan plus other solid prospects to get a team to eat most of that deal.

And I think the FO would jump at doing it actually. Because it'd also allow for another decent sized move to stay under the max LT penalties. Prospects are just currency at this point and can be used in any manner to help the ML team.
0 x
Additional rule: you have to have one or the other.The only exception is you have an amazing board name. davell, I'm looking at you; put up a [expletive] avatar or something if your name only sounds like somebody tried say Dave as they lapsed into a coma.

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 5211
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 287
x 386

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby TomtheBombadil » Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:42 am

davell wrote:Probably not. But I don't remember Arizona's system when they moved Touki with Arroyo.

At any rate, I think they'll do their best to move Heyward, for Bryce. And it's take Ademan plus other solid prospects to get a team to eat most of that deal.

And I think the FO would jump at doing it actually. Because it'd also allow for another decent sized move to stay under the max LT penalties. Prospects are just currency at this point and can be used in any manner to help the ML team.


Edited in my last post but this seems like the opposite of what the FO would do just to get out of some money. They're a little more than a year out from having more money than they can spend if everything goes as expected with the media rights up for sale.
0 x

davell
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21149
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:55 pm
x 1677
x 2121

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby davell » Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:07 pm

TomtheBombadil wrote:
davell wrote:Probably not. But I don't remember Arizona's system when they moved Touki with Arroyo.

At any rate, I think they'll do their best to move Heyward, for Bryce. And it's take Ademan plus other solid prospects to get a team to eat most of that deal.

And I think the FO would jump at doing it actually. Because it'd also allow for another decent sized move to stay under the max LT penalties. Prospects are just currency at this point and can be used in any manner to help the ML team.


Edited in my last post but this seems like the opposite of what the FO would do just to get out of some money. They're a little more than a year out from having more money than they can spend if everything goes as expected with the media rights up for sale.


Don't see them or ANY team heading into the draft pick loss section of the luxury tax, no matter how much money they can afford to spend. Theo especially, since he may have designs on the commissioner gig himself, at some stage. MLB doesn't want teams exploiting that and I don't see teams doing it.
0 x
Additional rule: you have to have one or the other.The only exception is you have an amazing board name. davell, I'm looking at you; put up a [expletive] avatar or something if your name only sounds like somebody tried say Dave as they lapsed into a coma.

CaliforniaRaisin
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 90197
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA
x 538
x 2672

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby CaliforniaRaisin » Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:54 pm

0 x
Image

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 5211
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 287
x 386

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby TomtheBombadil » Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:00 pm

davell wrote:Don't see them or ANY team heading into the draft pick loss section of the luxury tax, no matter how much money they can afford to spend. Theo especially, since he may have designs on the commissioner gig himself, at some stage. MLB doesn't want teams exploiting that and I don't see teams doing it.


It’s hard to imagine Epstein giving up likely his top prospect to dump a salary over a commissioner’s job that may not be available for another twenty+ years.
0 x

davell
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21149
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:55 pm
x 1677
x 2121

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby davell » Tue Apr 17, 2018 12:04 am

TomtheBombadil wrote:
davell wrote:Don't see them or ANY team heading into the draft pick loss section of the luxury tax, no matter how much money they can afford to spend. Theo especially, since he may have designs on the commissioner gig himself, at some stage. MLB doesn't want teams exploiting that and I don't see teams doing it.


It’s hard to imagine Epstein giving up likely his top prospect to dump a salary over a commissioner’s job that may not be available for another twenty+ years.


The commish job is not THE reason. The true point is Hayward sucks, is paid lots of money, and moving his salary off the books will give us a bunch of added flexibility. It would take Ademan plus to move him. But, the added draft picks, plus the IFA class additions, should allow us to move a few guys......
0 x
Additional rule: you have to have one or the other.The only exception is you have an amazing board name. davell, I'm looking at you; put up a [expletive] avatar or something if your name only sounds like somebody tried say Dave as they lapsed into a coma.

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 5211
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 287
x 386

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby TomtheBombadil » Tue Apr 17, 2018 12:28 am

davell wrote:The commish job is not THE reason. The true point is Hayward sucks, is paid lots of money, and moving his salary off the books will give us a bunch of added flexibility. It would take Ademan plus to move him. But, the added draft picks, plus the IFA class additions, should allow us to move a few guys......


Well first the commisioner thing isn't a reason at all. From there even if the bold were true, and it's probably not, giving away cheap talent to save money they have is not something this FO has ever done. They just do no act so desperately, I don't expect them to start. Hell, no one dumps their likely top prospect to dump a contract. If there's any comparable to Toussaint in the org, a mediocre and still probably the best and biggest name prospect traded in a salary dump, it's Albertos.
0 x

Jaxbro
Starter
Posts: 496
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:49 pm
x 21
x 101

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby Jaxbro » Tue Apr 17, 2018 1:50 am

Holy crap!!! 5 shutout innings of one hit one walk ball for Trevor Clifton. Struck out 5 on 75 pitches. 5-2 ground/fly outs.
1 x

davell
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21149
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:55 pm
x 1677
x 2121

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby davell » Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:02 am

TomtheBombadil wrote:
davell wrote:The commish job is not THE reason. The true point is Hayward sucks, is paid lots of money, and moving his salary off the books will give us a bunch of added flexibility. It would take Ademan plus to move him. But, the added draft picks, plus the IFA class additions, should allow us to move a few guys......


Well first the commisioner thing isn't a reason at all. From there even if the bold were true, and it's probably not, giving away cheap talent to save money they have is not something this FO has ever done. They just do no act so desperately, I don't expect them to start. Hell, no one dumps their likely top prospect to dump a contract. If there's any comparable to Toussaint in the org, a mediocre and still probably the best and biggest name prospect traded in a salary dump, it's Albertos.


Lol. Touki was sent with a SINGLE year of Arroyo. Think it was around 14 mill total. That's what a guy like Touki brings. It's 106 mill of Heyward. That's going to cost a HELL of a lot more than that. Anyway, I'm done talking about it.
0 x
Additional rule: you have to have one or the other.The only exception is you have an amazing board name. davell, I'm looking at you; put up a [expletive] avatar or something if your name only sounds like somebody tried say Dave as they lapsed into a coma.

User avatar
Bobson Dugnutt
All-Star
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 9:19 pm
Location: Ukrainian Village
x 1166
x 790

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby Bobson Dugnutt » Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:22 am

Didn’t AZ get destroyed by pretty much everyone when they made that deal though?
0 x
Image

User avatar
Cubswin11
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21058
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:17 pm
x 4463
x 3721

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby Cubswin11 » Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:35 am

How hard would it even be to get under the LT in 2 years after Zobrist, Morrow and Lester are all off the books, that’s over $50 million between the 3? Hopefully we just suck it up and take the LT hit the next 2 years and get under/reset the year after that.
0 x
Screw Pitchers

CaliforniaRaisin
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 90197
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA
x 538
x 2672

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby CaliforniaRaisin » Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:39 am

CaliforniaRaisin wrote:


https://www.thecubreporter.com/04162018 ... -riverview

Brailyn Marquez and Jeremiah Estrada combined to strike out seven of the first 11 men they faced, and seven pitchers combined to toss a five-hitter

...

RHPs Fernando Calderon, Benjamin Rodriguez, and Jose M. Gonzalez made their U. S. debut in today's game, working one inning a piece. All three pitched in the DSL last year.

Not counting pitchers who are rehabbing at Extended Spring Training, Marquez and Estrada are clearly the Cubs top two pitching prospects at EXST, and the duo will likely be at the top of the Eugene starting rotation when the NWL begins play in June.


1. Brailyn Marquez: 2.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 4 K, 1 WP, 0/3 GO/AO, 33 pitches (19 strikes)
2. Jeremiah Estrada: 1.1 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 4 BB, 3 K, 1 WP, 0/1 GO/AO, 39 pitches (16 strikes)
0 x
Image

davell
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21149
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:55 pm
x 1677
x 2121

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby davell » Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:41 am

Bobson Dugnutt wrote:Didn’t AZ get destroyed by pretty much everyone when they made that deal though?


They did. But, a team isn't taking on a 100 mill, without getting something very good in return. And for these next few years, I think there's going to be a decent amount of these deals. Because I don't see a single team going into the highest penalty box of the LT.(even if it makes more sense for them to do it)
0 x
Additional rule: you have to have one or the other.The only exception is you have an amazing board name. davell, I'm looking at you; put up a [expletive] avatar or something if your name only sounds like somebody tried say Dave as they lapsed into a coma.

davell
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21149
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:55 pm
x 1677
x 2121

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby davell » Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:49 am

Cubswin11 wrote:How hard would it even be to get under the LT in 2 years after Zobrist, Morrow and Lester are all off the books, that’s over $50 million between the 3? Hopefully we just suck it up and take the LT hit the next 2 years and get under/reset the year after that.


Oh, we're going to go over. Next year. We're just not going to hit the 40+ mill overage penalty box. Losing those guys helps obviously, but arb raises will eat into that a ton honestly.
0 x
Additional rule: you have to have one or the other.The only exception is you have an amazing board name. davell, I'm looking at you; put up a [expletive] avatar or something if your name only sounds like somebody tried say Dave as they lapsed into a coma.

User avatar
Regular Show
All-Star
Posts: 1436
Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 10:16 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 1263
x 372

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby Regular Show » Tue Apr 17, 2018 3:34 am

CaliforniaRaisin wrote:
CaliforniaRaisin wrote:


https://www.thecubreporter.com/04162018 ... -riverview

Brailyn Marquez and Jeremiah Estrada combined to strike out seven of the first 11 men they faced, and seven pitchers combined to toss a five-hitter

...

RHPs Fernando Calderon, Benjamin Rodriguez, and Jose M. Gonzalez made their U. S. debut in today's game, working one inning a piece. All three pitched in the DSL last year.

Not counting pitchers who are rehabbing at Extended Spring Training, Marquez and Estrada are clearly the Cubs top two pitching prospects at EXST, and the duo will likely be at the top of the Eugene starting rotation when the NWL begins play in June.


1. Brailyn Marquez: 2.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 4 K, 1 WP, 0/3 GO/AO, 33 pitches (19 strikes)
2. Jeremiah Estrada: 1.1 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 4 BB, 3 K, 1 WP, 0/1 GO/AO, 39 pitches (16 strikes)


That's awesome to read about. I really liked Estrada in last year's draft and I'm glad he fell to the Cubs. If that plus changeup is back and he can command it I'm not too worried about the curveball. I remember even reading some scouting reports that mentioned how it might develop into a plus-plus changeup in time.
1 x
"It was met with, basically, he didn't want to talk about that. He didn't want me to tell him that. I just basically said, 'Well that's why we want an electronic strike zone.'" -- Ben Zobrist

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 5211
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 287
x 386

Re: Minor League Discussion & Boxes, 4-16-18

Postby TomtheBombadil » Tue Apr 17, 2018 8:47 am

There's still zero precedent for that kind of deal where an org gives up proooobably their top prospect to dump a salary. There has, OTOH, been Heyward sized dumps (the Red Sox/Dodgers trade, Rockies/Jays, Stanton). Teams like the Phillies and Braves have tons to spend and little to spend on, and Heyward was a good player for a long time still being moved in his 20's so most likely if anything the Cubs are padding his deal with their overstuffed low minors pitching (Albertos, Estrada, Marquez, all those former college turned org arms). Even then the Cubs have the money to just eat Heyward's situation and pay Harper without really throwing anything off, let alone giving away from the top of their prospect pile.
0 x


Return to “Minor Leagues”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jaxbro and 0 guests