I like Gold Gloves and I cannot lie: the Jason Heyward thread

User avatar
NOLA
All-Star
Posts: 3280
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 3:17 am
Location: Marigny, New Orleans
x 336
x 218
Contact:

I like Gold Gloves and I cannot lie: the Jason Heyward thread

Postby NOLA » Sun May 01, 2016 10:22 pm

Derwood wrote:His defense has been awesome, but he's completely lost at the plate. Reminds me of Castro pressing last year and constantly rolling over easy grounders to the infield. Also feels like he's striking out a ton without the power to offset it

I was seriously wondering if someone was going to start a thread like this today. I know he's a slow starter, but he looks lost at the plate. The good news is that he's sucking and we're still awesome.
0 x

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 19813
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 10:57 am
Location: The Wastes
x 82
x 273
Contact:

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby XZero77 » Sun May 01, 2016 10:31 pm

He's a slow starter, and what we've seen thus far is pretty much what I expected but hoped not to see. But he's taking walks, not really striking out as much as it might seem, and playing stellar defense. I'm not concerned.
0 x

User avatar
Cubswin11
Superstar
Posts: 15559
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:17 pm
x 1212
x 1173

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Cubswin11 » Sun May 01, 2016 10:35 pm

The only thing I worry about is that it seems we aren't going to get the Heyward on offense that takes the next step/leap that so many were hopeful for and know he has the potential to be more. Instead we are probably "only" going to end up with a normal, solid, year from him of a ~10% BB rate, ~15% K rate, .250-.270/.340-.360/.390-.430 slash line and mid-low teens dongs along with his spectacular defense. Which is fine.
Last edited by Cubswin11 on Sun May 01, 2016 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 x
Screw Pitchers

User avatar
XZero77
Superstar
Posts: 19813
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 10:57 am
Location: The Wastes
x 82
x 273
Contact:

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby XZero77 » Sun May 01, 2016 10:37 pm

Cubswin11 wrote:The only thing I worry about is that it seems we aren't going to get the Heyward on offense that takes the next step/leap that so many were hopeful for and know he has the potential to be more and instead we are probably "only" going to end up with a normal, solid, year from him of a ~10% BB rate, ~15% K rate, .250-.270/.340-.360/.390-.430 slash line and mid-low teens dongs along with his spectacular defense. Which is fine.


It's very premature to say that.
1 x

User avatar
Cubswin11
Superstar
Posts: 15559
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:17 pm
x 1212
x 1173

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Cubswin11 » Sun May 01, 2016 10:45 pm

XZero77 wrote:
Cubswin11 wrote:The only thing I worry about is that it seems we aren't going to get the Heyward on offense that takes the next step/leap that so many were hopeful for and know he has the potential to be more and instead we are probably "only" going to end up with a normal, solid, year from him of a ~10% BB rate, ~15% K rate, .250-.270/.340-.360/.390-.430 slash line and mid-low teens dongs along with his spectacular defense. Which is fine.


It's very premature to say that.

I agree. But in terms of things to worry about Heyward that's my only real "worry," that we have the offensive player of what he's been the past 3 years instead of a guy taking a offensive leap. Which, like I said, I'm more than fine with him being the player he has been the last 3 years on offense.
0 x
Screw Pitchers

User avatar
Duke Silver
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 8126
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 6:45 am
x 6103
x 3630

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Duke Silver » Sun May 01, 2016 10:59 pm

Please don't compare him to Starlin Castro. Starlin has a history of looking horrible at the plate for long periods of time. Starlin twice went a whole season with a wOBA under .290. Jason Heyward has had a wRC+ of at least 110 in 5 of his 6 seasons, being over 120 four times. He might look like Starlin right now. But the man has a history of starting off slowly and then picking it up. It's troubling in the sense of "Why are you starting off slowly again, J-Hey?" When Starlin was bad, it was, "Oh great, Starlin sucks again."

Heyward has a proven track record of being a good hitter. Starlin's track record is checkered, to be kind. I am not going to worry about a guy with thousands of good ABs until much later in the year.
0 x

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
All-Star
Posts: 4122
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 142
x 224

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby TomtheBombadil » Sun May 01, 2016 10:59 pm

Not worried at all unless there's an injury, and there isn't one. The best part about Heyward is that a normal Heyward year is fine and he's still only 27 next year.
0 x

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 71210
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 1266
x 2099
Contact:

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby UMFan83 » Sun May 01, 2016 11:02 pm

Heyward has a track record of not being horrible at hitting a baseball so I am sure eventually he will get it going but that doesn't mean I'm not frustrated
0 x
Win it for Fred

tawfiqmp
Role Player
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:21 am
x 23
x 20

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby tawfiqmp » Mon May 02, 2016 4:49 am

He'll be fine and the Cubs aren't asking much out of him. Just be awesome out in the field and drive in a good supply of runs and they're in good shape.
0 x

User avatar
rocket
Superstar
Posts: 18281
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:48 am
Location: Dayton, Ohio
x 327
x 244
Contact:

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby rocket » Mon May 02, 2016 12:12 pm

he'll probably be fine. good thing the cubs are winning though cause it probably would be ugly with the fans otherwise.
0 x

User avatar
Cubbie Swagger
All-Star
Posts: 1382
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 8:57 am
x 75
x 21

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Cubbie Swagger » Mon May 02, 2016 12:35 pm

I'm a little worried that he's gonna have a down year offensively and everyone is gonna freak out like, "SEE! $184 MIL FOR DEFENSE!"

In the long run, though, it will work out. As others have said, he has a track record and he will hit eventually.
0 x
Image

User avatar
rocket
Superstar
Posts: 18281
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:48 am
Location: Dayton, Ohio
x 327
x 244
Contact:

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby rocket » Mon May 02, 2016 1:59 pm

if hypothetically he sucks the next 3 years, what are the chances of him giving us a courtesy opt-out?
0 x

CaliforniaRaisin
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87807
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA
x 313
x 1221

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby CaliforniaRaisin » Mon May 02, 2016 2:17 pm

NOLA wrote:
Derwood wrote:His defense has been awesome, but he's completely lost at the plate. Reminds me of Castro pressing last year and constantly rolling over easy grounders to the infield. Also feels like he's striking out a ton without the power to offset it

I was seriously wondering if someone was going to start a thread like this today. I know he's a slow starter, but he looks lost at the plate. The good news is that he's sucking and we're still awesome.


I always find this sort of statement weird. Most guys who are slumping tend to look lost at the plate.
0 x
Image

User avatar
PetermanRealityTour
Role Player
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:03 pm
x 18
x 73

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby PetermanRealityTour » Mon May 02, 2016 2:18 pm

Players after signing a big contract always seem to press and struggle out of the gate the next year. Expecting him to greatly improve over the course of the season
0 x

User avatar
sneakypower
Javy Baez Fanclub President
Posts: 11509
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:58 am
Location: behind the boathouse
x 352
x 696

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby sneakypower » Mon May 02, 2016 2:31 pm

.705 career OPS in April and .793 rest of the season; i'm not worried but maybe next year we can ask him to move to 6th or 7th spot for a month to start
0 x
Image

BigSlick
Superstar
Posts: 12867
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 7:04 pm
x 1459
x 305

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby BigSlick » Mon May 02, 2016 5:15 pm

I actually don't think he looks *lost* at the plate. When I hear "lost" I think of someone like Baez or Soler who sometimes just comes up guessing and hacking at garbage and then walking dutifully back to the bench. Heyward's strike zone judgment is as good as it usually is, he's just not hitting much hard. In fact, paradoxically, I know they were talking about adding more loft to his swing this year, and honestly it looks like he's purposefully putting more on the ground (or maybe he's just late and on top of a bunch of stuff, who knows)
0 x
Image
"The only good sabermetrician is a dead one." --Andrew Jackson, 1776.

I have to admit its getting better...it can't get no worse - The Beatles (On the Cubs)

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 71210
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 1266
x 2099
Contact:

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby UMFan83 » Mon May 02, 2016 5:48 pm

sneakypower wrote:.705 career OPS in April and .793 rest of the season; i'm not worried but maybe next year we can ask him to move to 6th or 7th spot for a month to start


I was thinking about suggesting that but for now the Cubs are winning and scoring lots of runs with him hitting there. Dropping him brings more attention to his struggles (especially after signing the largest contract in Cubs history). And while his strikeout rate is 5% higher than last year, he's not striking out at outrageous levels and is still working the count taking walks.
0 x
Win it for Fred

Bryant's Disco Ball
All-Star
Posts: 4444
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:34 am
Location: Formerly PleasewinCubs
x 1
x 297

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Bryant's Disco Ball » Mon May 02, 2016 6:21 pm

From the moment he signed in December I anticipated this thread being made.

There is a good chance J-Hey is never going to look great on offense. His value, again, is that he does everything really solid when it comes to baseball. Doing a bunch of really good things adds up to a great player. Fielding in all aspects, baserunning, walking, getting some hits and a few home runs.

The only thing I get annoyed at with J-Hey is a bunch of you bitches constantly asking for a dong every time he comes up when you should just be asking for a double or single or perhaps a walk and a steal.
0 x
Not saying it will happen, but the Cubs coming back from a 3-1 deficit to win the World Series does seem like the appropriate way to cap off this season and make the 30-for-30 even better.

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 68304
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 4486
x 5793

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Sammy Sofa » Mon May 02, 2016 6:38 pm

That's dongless coward talk.
1 x
► Show Spoiler

Bryant's Disco Ball
All-Star
Posts: 4444
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:34 am
Location: Formerly PleasewinCubs
x 1
x 297

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Bryant's Disco Ball » Mon May 02, 2016 7:04 pm

Sammy Sofa wrote:That's dongless coward talk.


It's more just understanding that not all dongs are created equal.
0 x
Not saying it will happen, but the Cubs coming back from a 3-1 deficit to win the World Series does seem like the appropriate way to cap off this season and make the 30-for-30 even better.

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 68304
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 4486
x 5793

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Sammy Sofa » Mon May 02, 2016 7:16 pm

Dude has shown the ability to dong prodigiously; it's not an unreasonable expectation.
0 x
► Show Spoiler

Bryant's Disco Ball
All-Star
Posts: 4444
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:34 am
Location: Formerly PleasewinCubs
x 1
x 297

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Bryant's Disco Ball » Mon May 02, 2016 7:19 pm

Sammy Sofa wrote:Dude has shown the ability to dong prodigiously; it's not an unreasonable expectation.


I mean, when he's been pretty consistent in the dong department for most of his career except for that one year (which wasn't really that prodigious), I think it might be a bit much to say that it's not an unreasonable expectation. The reasonable expectation is that he will dong 10 to 13 times. Not 25 to 30. So it's odd that people are always bringing up J-Hey's dong like it's this big part of his game. It's not. Not even close.
0 x
Not saying it will happen, but the Cubs coming back from a 3-1 deficit to win the World Series does seem like the appropriate way to cap off this season and make the 30-for-30 even better.

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
All-Star
Posts: 4122
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 142
x 224

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby TomtheBombadil » Mon May 02, 2016 7:25 pm

Bryant's Disco Ball wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:Dude has shown the ability to dong prodigiously; it's not an unreasonable expectation.


I mean, when he's been pretty consistent in the dong department for most of his career except for that one year (which wasn't really that prodigious), I think it might be a bit much to say that it's not an unreasonable expectation. The reasonable expectation is that he will dong 10 to 13 times. Not 25 to 30. So it's odd that people are always bringing up J-Hey's dong like it's this big part of his game. It's not. Not even close.


Actually Heyward's averaged 14 HRs a season and 19 per 162 games.

Early season has him putting the ball in the air more often, which should be a good thing moving forward.
0 x

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 68304
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 4486
x 5793

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Sammy Sofa » Mon May 02, 2016 7:27 pm

Well that's not fun. I mean, people are bringing it up because even if he only hits 15 or less, we're all fans of dongs and he is still sans dong at this moment, both for the season and as a Cub. We're rooting for him to bust that dong out.

But hey, what do we know? We're just a bunch of bitches, I guess.
0 x
► Show Spoiler

Bryant's Disco Ball
All-Star
Posts: 4444
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:34 am
Location: Formerly PleasewinCubs
x 1
x 297

Re: Time to worry about Heyward yet?

Postby Bryant's Disco Ball » Mon May 02, 2016 7:30 pm

TomtheBombadil wrote:
Bryant's Disco Ball wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:Dude has shown the ability to dong prodigiously; it's not an unreasonable expectation.


I mean, when he's been pretty consistent in the dong department for most of his career except for that one year (which wasn't really that prodigious), I think it might be a bit much to say that it's not an unreasonable expectation. The reasonable expectation is that he will dong 10 to 13 times. Not 25 to 30. So it's odd that people are always bringing up J-Hey's dong like it's this big part of his game. It's not. Not even close.


Actually Heyward's averaged 14 HRs a season and 19 per 162 games.

Early season has him putting the ball in the air more often, which should be a good thing moving forward.


Well, yes, because it's jacked up by that one 27 homer season. In the past three seasons he has hit 14, 11 and 13. His other three seasons he's hit 18, 14, 27.

I'm thinking since he has hit 11 to 14 in four of his six seasons, that that is more likely where he is going to end up. But the dude has never been a "prodigious" home run hitter, and the focus on that part of his game like he suddenly is going to be one is odd to me. Sure, anything is possible. But the safer bet is that he hits 10 to 14. So, again, not sure why people constantly ask for a Heyward dong like he's Rizzo or Bryant. He's Zobrist. And nobody is constantly asking for Zobrist dongs.
0 x
Not saying it will happen, but the Cubs coming back from a 3-1 deficit to win the World Series does seem like the appropriate way to cap off this season and make the 30-for-30 even better.


Return to “Cubs Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests