The_Achiever wrote:Sounds like the pee tape(s) are real.
Politics & Current Events
- Brian
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 28910
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:43 pm
- Location: Chicago
- x 42
- x 5001
- Contact:
The_Achiever wrote:Sounds like the pee tape(s) are real.
Brian wrote:The_Achiever wrote:Sounds like the pee tape(s) are real.
Sammy Sofa wrote:minnesotacubsfan wrote:Sammy Sofa wrote:
As was I, which is why it's a moot point involving someone like Warren.
Ok?
Dude, I'm saying it's pointless to bring up a Bush/Cheney-type of situation when the discussion is centered around whether or not the traditionally not-powerful role of VP is the best place for someone like Elizabeth freakin' Warren. It should be painfully obvious that that example is not applicable here at all.
minnesotacubsfan wrote:There are absolutely ways for her to be effective in the VP, and it's not pointless at all to consider if you have other choices for Sec. of Treasury, Labor or Commerce who could be as effective as she would be.
unless you felt she could be the pivotal seat in the Senate and a hard-line policy hawk.
Derwood wrote:So there's almost nothing that the AG said in the 4 page memo, to Congress, or in today's press conference that wasn't either wildly partisan or wildly misleading. Aweseome
In perhaps the best illustration of Barr's bad faith in preparing his summary, we can now see the full paragraph from which Barr chose to quote only the final clause (in italics):The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign. Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
Not a word is, or could be defensibly redacted. There was no reason to only excerpt 25% of a sentence that was explicitly written by the Special Counsel to summarize his own conclusions.
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.
minnesotacubsfan wrote:Adam Corolla is and has always been a douche
badger wrote:minnesotacubsfan wrote:Adam Corolla is and has always been a douche
I literally had no idea that he still has any relevancy in the world today.
badger wrote:minnesotacubsfan wrote:Adam Corolla is and has always been a douche
I literally had no idea that he still has any relevancy in the world today.
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.
Derwood wrote:badger wrote:minnesotacubsfan wrote:Adam Corolla is and has always been a douche
I literally had no idea that he still has any relevancy in the world today.
Adam Corolla appeals to the same types of people who enjoy Joe Rogan podcasts
Derwood wrote:"Do their constitutional duty" lolol ok, sure
Banedon wrote:Derwood wrote:"Do their constitutional duty" lolol ok, sure
Please explain your amusement.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Brian and 11 guests