Kyle Hendricks' velocity, or lack thereof, has caused a lot of panic in Wrigleyville. This isn't quite a doomsday scenario, though. Perhaps I've deluded myself, but I'm ready to take the jump and ride that 84 mph fastball all the way back to the World Series.
I'll admit, when I first saw Kyle throwing 84 mph fastballs, I was alarmed. Hendricks had spent his first three years in the majors with a sinker that sat above 88 mph. And in two of his first three games this year, while he got off to a sub-par start, his sinker averaged less than 85 mph. I was cautiously optimistic because Hendricks started out last year at a lower velocity, before ramping it up as the season went along. Hendricks did see his velocity rise again this year after the scary April, with his sinker averaging over 86 mph in May and June before a hand injury shut him down for nearly two months.Add a comment
After bouncing back-and-forth between the majors and the minors in 2006 and 2007, Jon Lester finally stuck in the Red Sox's rotation full-time in 2008. He quickly became one of the best pitchers in the league. From 2008 through 2011, Lester was worth well over 4 wins per season, as measured by fWAR. According to RA9-WAR, he was worth nearly 6 wins per season during those years. Great peripherals; even better results.
Lester experienced a mid-career hiccup in 2012 and 2013, though. While he finished each of his first four full seasons with an ERA below 3.50 (in the AL, while pitching in hitter-friendly Fenway Park), his ERA across the 2012 and 2013 seasons was 4.28. His peripherals were a little better, as his FIP was 3.84 and his xFIP was 3.86. Still, it wasn't the kind of performance Red Sox fans had become accustomed to seeing. His strikeouts were down. He was allowing more base runners. And those base runners were scoring more often. Lester was only worth about 3 wins per season in 2012 and 2013, according to both fWAR and RA9-WAR.Add a comment
On April 17, I wrote an article titled "Kyle Schwarber is Breaking Out." At the time, Schwarber was hitting .244/.393/.444. Since then, Schwarber has hit .151/.270/.302 in 100 PA. Real ground-breaking analysis I'm providing here at NSBB. You'd be well within your rights to call this Fake News.
There are only two explanations that make sense here: Either Kyle Schwarber was not breaking out or... I've cursed him. The first explanation is plausible. It was only a couple weeks into the season. That's a little early for me to be making such boastful proclamations. The second explanation is also plausible.Add a comment
The Cubs head into a Sunday night matchup with the Red Sox with a 13-10 record, sitting in first place in the NL Central, having won six of seven series. Things are going pretty well on the Northside, even if, perhaps, not as well as we'd expected. One area of concern for most fans is probably the well-being of the starting rotation. Collectively, Cubs starters have a 4.34 ERA, which ranks 22nd in baseball. An inauspicious start, indeed, for a staff that put together a 2.96 ERA last year. Last year's rotation was good at just about everything. They ranked 5th in K/9, 6th in BB/9, 7th in GB%, 2nd in HR/9, 4th in FIP, 3rd in xFIP, 2nd in IP, 2nd in xwOBA, 2nd in average exit velocity, and 2nd in % of pitches that were "barreled." It was a fair assumption that starting pitching would be a strength for the Cubbies in 2017, what with the staff being led by the second- and third-place finishers in Cy Young voting last year and another guy who won the award the year before.
So what's going on with the Cubs? Let's start with the issue that Jeff Sullivan ponders in the linked article: the velocity, or lack thereof. Cubs' starters have seen large drops in velocity, across the board, in the early going. Sullivan wonders if perhaps the Cubs have instructed their starters to take it easy out of the gate, in order to save some bullets for when things really matter. Sullivan states:
Add a comment
That’s not something I can recall ever seeing, but I see how it might be a workable theory....Which would be very cool, and a little bit cocky.
It's been awhile since we've posted an article here at NSBB. In the meantime, if you haven't heard, the Chicago Cubs won the World Series. It's true: The Chicago Cubs are defending World Series champions. One of the contributing factors to the Cubs' championship run was Javy Baez's stellar play at various times during the post-season. Most obvious during the playoffs were Baez's athleticism and keen awareness in the field. He also produced some defining moments with his bat during times of considerable importance. However, he did strike out 21 times in 71 PA.
Striking out isn't something new to Javy Baez. He's always struck out. A lot. Except, right now, he isn't striking out very much. To be fair, he's only had 20 PA in Spring Training, during which he's struck out but twice. But he's also been playing in the World Baseball Classic, in which he's only struck out 3 times in 21 PA. Before we get any further, I should mention that Spring Training stats really don't matter very much, if at all. I think you all know that. But it's important that I inform the reader that I, also, am aware of such. So, even though I am writing an article about Javier Baez's Spring Training stats, let's all agree to not take much from this article. I'm merely writing this to bring to attention something that might be worth keeping an eye on.Add a comment
Kyle Schwarber is back playing baseball this year after missing nearly all of 2016. The last thing you probably remember about Schwarber is his superhero performance in the 2016 World Series. You may have forgotten about the strikeouts, though. Strikeouts have been a bit of a problem for Schwarber during his time with the Cubs. He struck out in 28.2% of his plate appearances in his rookie season. He's striking out in 33.9% of his plate appearances this year. That K% ranks 12th highest in the majors of qualified hitters. Granted, he's still been a very good hitter, due to his power and ability to get on base. But, he's really taken his Three True Outcome profile to the extremes in the early going this season. Despite his high strikeout rate, he's still posted a 130 wRC+, largely thanks to his 17.9% BB%. Though it's rather jarring to see a leadoff hitter striking out this often, Schwarber's .393 OBP is second-highest of 20 players with at least 40 PA while hitting lead-off.
If there's one thing you want from your leadoff hitter, it's probably for him to get on base. Schwarber's filling his duties as a leadoff hitter, even if he's doing it extremely unconventionally. But, I'm here to tell you that things are actually going even better than they may seem. While his strikeout rate is way up, Schwarber's actually making a lot more contact. The one major red flag with Schwarber in 2015 was his contact rate, particularly his contact rate on pitches inside the strike zone. As Dave Cameron pointed out at Fangraphs:Add a comment
Kyle Hendricks has been really good this year. You don't need me to tell you that. But, I am going to tell you about it anyway. What is to follow is the first in a two-part series about Kyle Hendricks' incredible season. This article will focus on why Hendricks is so good this year. My next article will explain how he's been able to pitch so well.
Hendricks has a 2.17 ERA and has already won 11 games -- a career high. Right now, it's hard to imagine where the Cubs would be without Hendricks in the rotation. Yet, Hendricks entered Spring Training fighting for a spot in the rotation with Adam Warren, who isn't even in the Cubs' organization anymore. The Cubs returned the reigning NL Cy Young winner, a guy that signed a $155 million contract the year before, a newly-signed free agent who is the only pitcher to ever win the clinching game of a World Series for two different franchises, and another solid veteran who has now had three consecutive seasons with double digit wins and an ERA under 4. Three of these veteran starters currently have an ERA under 3 and the other is at 3.56. And, despite all of that, Kyle Hendricks has been the most dependable starter on the staff.Add a comment